Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISBN: 9781843765462
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (x, 305 pages) , illustrations
    Series Statement: New horizons in environmental economics
    Series Statement: Edward Elgar E-Book Archive
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Elektronische Reproduktion von Controlling global warming
    DDC: 363.738/746
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Internationale Umweltpolitik ; Klimawandel ; Theorie ; Global warming Prevention ; Electronic books ; Aufsatzsammlung ; Aufsatzsammlung ; Erwärmung ; Aufsatzsammlung ; Treibhauseffekt ; Aufsatzsammlung ; Treibhauseffekt ; Umweltpolitik ; Klimaänderung ; Treibhauseffekt ; Erwärmung
    Abstract: In this exhaustive study, the authors break new ground by integrating cutting edge insights on global warming from three different perspectives: game theory, cost-effectiveness analysis and public choice. For each perspective the authors provide an overview of important results, discuss the theoretical consistency of the models and assumptions, highlight the practical problems which are not yet captured by theory and explore the different applications to the various problems encountered in global warming. They demonstrate how each perspective has its own merits and weaknesses, and advocate an integrated approach as the best way forward. They also propose a research agenda for the future which encompasses the three methods to create a powerful tool for the analysis and resolution of global pollution problems.
    Abstract: 1. Introduction -- 2. Game theory and international environmental cooperation : any practical application? -- 3. Economic impacts of carbon abatement strategies -- 4. On the political economy of international environmental agreements : some theoretical considerations and empirical findings -- 5. Interest group preference for instruments of environmental policy : an overview -- 6. Interest group preference for international emissions trading scheme -- 7. Conclusion
    Note: Includes bibliographical references and index
    URL: Volltext  (Deutschlandweit zugänglich)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cheltenman, U.K : Edward Elgar
    ISBN: 9781843762898
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (xv, 416 p) , ill
    Series Statement: New horizons in environmental economics
    Series Statement: Edward Elgar E-Book Archive
    Parallel Title: Available in another form
    Parallel Title: Elektronische Reproduktion von Finus, Michael, 1965 - Game theory and international environmental cooperation
    Parallel Title: Elektronische Reproduktion von Finus, Michael, 1965 - Game theory and international environmental cooperation
    DDC: 333.7
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Internationale Umweltpolitik ; Spieltheorie ; Kooperatives Spiel ; Umweltabkommen ; Klimaschutz ; Verhandlungstheorie ; Koalition ; Theorie ; Environmental economics ; Environmental law, International ; Game theory ; Electronic books ; Internationales Umweltrecht ; Spieltheorie ; Umweltökonomie ; Umweltökonomie ; Spieltheorie ; Umweltpolitik ; Kooperation
    Abstract: The book investigates various strategies to provide countries with an incentive to accede, agree and comply to an international environmental agreement (IEA). Finus shows that by integrating real world restrictions into a model, game theory is a powerful tool for explaining the divergence between "first-best" policy recommendations and "second-best" designs of actual IEAs. For instance he explains why (inefficient) uniform emission reduction quotas have played such a prominent role in past IEAs despite economists' recommendations for the use of (efficient) market-based instruments as for example emission targets and permits. Moreover, it is stated, that a single, global IEA on climate is not necessarily the best strategy and small coalitions may enjoy a higher stability and may achieve more
    Abstract: 1. Introduction -- 2. Important terms, notation and classification of games -- 3. Static games with discrete strategy space -- 4. Finite dynamic games with discrete strategy space : a first approach -- 5. Infinite dynamic games with discrete strategy space : a first approach -- 6. Finite dynamic games with discrete strategy space : a second approach -- 7. Infinite dynamic games with discrete strategy space : a second approach -- 8. Issue linkage -- 9. Static games with continuous strategy space : global emission game -- 10. Finite dynamic games with continuous strategy space and static representations of dynamic games -- 11. Bargaining over a uniform emission reduction quota and a uniform emission tax -- 12. Infinite dynamic games with continuous strategy space -- 13. Coalition models : a first approach -- 14. Coalition models : a second approach -- 15. Coalition models : a third approach -- 16. Summary and conclusions
    Note: Includes bibliographical references and index
    URL: Volltext  (Deutschlandweit zugänglich)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar Pub
    ISBN: 9781784713201
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (p) , cm
    Series Statement: The international library of critical writings in economics series
    Series Statement: Edward Elgar E-Book Archive
    Parallel Title: Available in another form
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als Game theory and international environmental cooperation
    DDC: 333.7015193
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Umweltabkommen ; Klimawandel ; Nachhaltige Entwicklung ; Spieltheorie ; Internationale Klimapolitik ; Game theory ; Environmental law, International ; Environmental economics ; Electronic books ; Aufsatzsammlung ; Spieltheorie ; Anwendung ; Umweltökonomie ; Umweltpolitik
    Abstract: Key environmental issues, such as biodiversity and climate change, have in recent years become more pressing than ever. Where the critical papers in the early 1990s explained the difficulties of cooperation in tackling transboundary environmental problems, later works have analyzed the various alternatives, and increased our understanding of various institutional designs and negotiation protocols' impact on the success of cooperation. This Research Review identifies the most important articles on the game theoretic analysis of international environmental cooperation to both confront the cooperative and non-cooperative approaches to this, and demonstrate the diversity of methods used to analyze international environmental agreements
    Abstract: A. Caparrós, J.-C. Péreau and T. Tazdai͏̈t (2004), 'North-South Climate Change Negotiations: A Sequential Game with Asymmetric Information', Public Choice, 121 (3-4), December, 455-80 -- Alejandro Caparrós and Jean-Christophe Péreau (2013), 'Forming Coalitions to Negotiate North-South Climate Agreements', Environment and Development Economics, Special Issue on Strategic Behaviour and Environmental Commons, 18 (1), February, 69-92 -- Bård Harstad (2012), 'Climate Contracts: A Game of Emissions, Investments, Negotiations, and Renegotiations', Review of Economic Studies, 79 (4), October, 1527-57 -- Carlo Carraro, Carmen Marchiori and Sonia Oreffice (2009), 'Endogenous Minimum Participation in International Environmental Treaties', Environmental and Resource Economics, 42 (3), March, 411-25 -- Astrid Dannenberg, Andreas Lange and Bodo Sturm (2014), 'Participation and Commitment in Voluntary Coalitions to Provide Public Goods', Economica, 81 (322), April, 257-75 -- Scott Barrett (2006), 'Climate Treaties and "Breakthrough" Technologies', American Economic Review, 96 (2), May, 22-5 -- Michael Hoel and Aart de Zeeuw (2010), 'Can a Focus on Breakthrough Technologies Improve the Performance of International Environmental Agreements?', Environmental and Resource Economics, 47 (3), November, 395-406 -- Matthew McGinty (2007), 'International Environmental Agreements among Asymmetric Nations', Oxford Economic Papers, 59 (1), January, 45-62 -- Hans-Peter Weikard (2009), 'Cartel Stability Under An Optimal Sharing Rule', Manchester School, 77 (5), September, 575-93 -- Carlo Carraro, Johan Eyckmans and Michael Finus (2006), 'Optimal Transfers and Participation Decisions in International Environmental Agreements', Review of International Organizations, 1 (4), December, 379-96 -- Matthew McGinty, Garrett Milam and Alejandro Gelves (2012), 'Coalition Stability in Public Goods Provision: Testing an Optimal Allocation Rule', Environmental and Resource Economics, 52 (3), July, 327-45 -- Stefan Ambec and Yves Sprumont (2002), 'Sharing a River', Journal of Economic Theory, 107 (2), December, 453-62 -- Andreas Lange and Carsten Vogt (2003), 'Cooperation in International Environmental Negotiations due to a Preference for Equity', Journal of Public Economics, 87 (9-10), September, 2049-67 -- Michael Kosfeld, Akira Okada and Arno Riedl (2009), 'Institution Formation in Public Goods Games', American Economic Review, 99 (4), September, 1335-55 -- Francesco Bosello, Barabara Buchner and Carlo Carraro (2003), 'Equity, Development, and Climate Change Control', Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (2-3), April-May, 601-11 -- Johan Eyckmans and Michael Finus (2006), 'Coalition Formation in a Global Warming Game: How the Design of Protocols Affects the Success of Environmental Treaty-Making', Natural Resource Modeling, 19 (3), September, 323-58 -- Geir B. Asheim, Camilla Bretteville Froyn, Jon Hovi and Fredric C. Menz (2006), 'Regional versus Global Cooperation for Climate Control', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51 (1), January, 93-109 -- Seong-lin Na and Hyun Song Shin (1998), 'International Environmental Agreements under Uncertainty', Oxford Economic Papers, 50 (2), April, 173-85 -- Michael Finus and Pedro Pintassilgo (2013), 'The Role of Uncertainty and Learning for the Success of International Climate Agreements', Journal of Public Economics, 103, July, 29-43 --
    Abstract: Alfred Endres and Cornelia Ohl (2001), 'International Environmental Cooperation in the One Shot Prisoners' Dilemma', Schmollers Jahrbuch, Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften/Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 121 (1), 1-26 -- Vincent Boucher and Yann Bramoullé (2010), 'Providing Global Public Goods under Uncertainty', Journal of Public Economics, 94 (9-10), October, 591-603 -- Scott Barrett (2013), 'Climate Treaties and Approaching Catastrophes', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66 (2), September, 235-50 -- Alessandro Tavoni, Astrid Dannenberg, Giorgos Kallis and Andreas Löschel (2011), 'Inequality, Communication, and The Avoidance of Disastrous Climate Change in a Public Goods Game', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (29), July, 11825-9 -- Lata Gangadharan and Veronika Nemes (2009) 'Experimental Analysis of Risk and Uncertainty in Provisioning Private and Public Goods', Economic Inquiry 47 (1), January, 146-64 -- Santiago J. Rubio and Alistair Ulph (2007), 'An Infinite-Horizon Model of Dynamic Membership of International Environmental Agreements', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54 (3), November, 296-310 -- Aart de Zeeuw (2008), 'Dynamic Effects on the Stability of International Environmental Agreements', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55 (2), March, 163-74 -- Marc Germain, Philippe Toint, Henry Tulkens and Aart de Zeeuw (2003), 'Transfers to Sustain Dynamic Core-Theoretic Cooperation in International Stock Pollutant Control', Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28 (1), October, 79-99 -- Hans-Peter Weikard, Rob Dellink and Ekko van Ierland (2010), 'Renegotiations in the Greenhouse', Environmental and Resource Economics, 45 (4), April, 573-96 -- Michèle Breton, Lucia Sbragia and Georges Zaccour (2010), 'A Dynamic Model for International Environmental Agreements', Environmental and Resource Economics, 45 (1), January, 25-48
    Abstract: Recommended readings (Machine generated): Karl-Göran Mäler (1989), 'The Acid Rain Game', in H. Folmer and E. van Ierland (eds), Valuation Methods and Policy Making in Environmental Economics, Chapter 12, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 231-52 -- Scott Barrett (1994), 'Self-Enforcing International Environmental Agreements', Oxford Economic Papers, Special Issue on Environmental Economics, 46, October, 878-94 -- Carlo Carraro and Domenico Siniscalco (1993), 'Strategies for the International Protection of the Environment', Journal of Public Economics, 52 (3), October, 309-28 -- Michael Hoel (1992), 'International Environment Conventions: The Case of Uniform Reductions of Emissions', Environmental and Resource Economics, 2 (2), March, 141-59 -- Parkash Chander and Henry Tulkens (1997), 'The Core of an Economy with Multilateral Environmental Externalities', International Journal of Game Theory, 26 (3), October, 379-401 -- Effrosyni Diamantoudi and Eftichios S. Sartzetakis (2006), 'Stable International Environmental Agreements: An Analytical Approach', Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8 (2), May, 247-63 -- Santiago J. Rubio and Alistair Ulph (2006), 'Self-Enforcing International Environmental Agreements Revisited', Oxford Economic Papers, 58 (2), April, 233-63 -- Larry Karp and Leo Simon (2013), 'Participation Games and International Environmental Agreements: A Non-Parametric Model', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65 (2), March, 326-44 -- Carsten Helm (2001), 'On the Existence of a Cooperative Solution for a Coalitional Game with Externalities', International Journal of Game Theory, 30 (1), September, 141-6 -- Rögnvaldur Hannesson (1997), 'Fishing as a Supergame', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32 (3), March, 309-22 -- Michael Finus and Sigve Tjøtta (2003), 'The Oslo Protocol on Sulfur Reduction: The Great Leap Forward?' Journal of Public Economics, 87 (9-10), September, 2031-48 -- Henk Folmer, Pierre v. Mouche and Shannon Ragland (1993), 'Interconnected Games and International Environmental Problems', Environmental and Resource Economics, 3 (4), August, 313-35 -- Anke Gerber and Philipp C. Wichardt (2009), 'Providing Public Goods in the Absence of Strong Institutions', Journal of Public Economics, 93 (3-4), April, 429-39 -- Todd L. Cherry and David M. McEvoy (2013), 'Enforcing Compliance with Environmental Agreements in the Absence of Strong Institutions: An Experimental Analysis', Environmental and Resource Economics, 54 (1), January, 63-77 -- David M. McEvoy and John K. Stranlund (2009), 'Self-Enforcing International Environmental Agreements with Costly Monitoring for Compliance', Environmental and Resource Economics, 42 (4), April, 491-508 -- Nori Tarui, Charles F. Mason, Stephen Polasky and Greg Ellis (2008), 'Cooperation in the Commons with Unobservable Actions', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55 (1), January, 37-51 -- Prajit K. Dutta and Roy Radner (2009) 'A Strategic Analysis of Global Warming: Theory and Some Numbers', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 71 (2), August, 187-209 -- Michael Finus and Bianca Rundshagen (1998), 'Toward a Positive Theory of Coalition Formation and Endogenous Instrumental Choice in Global Pollution Control', Public Choice, 96 (1-2), July, 145-86 -- Scott Barrett (2002), 'Consensus Treaties', Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 158 (4), December, 529-47 -- Pierre Courtois and Guillaume Haeringer (2012), 'Environmental Cooperation: Ratifying Second-Best Agreements', Public Choice, 151 (3-4), June, 565-84 --
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...