Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISBN: 9781108775373 , 9781108477956 , 9781108745307
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 online resource (xx, 254 pages) , digital, PDF file(s).
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als Carey, John M., 1964 - Campus diversity
    DDC: 378.1/982
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Discrimination in higher education ; College teachers Attitudes ; College students Attitudes ; College teachers Recruiting ; Universities and colleges Admission ; Affirmative action programs in education ; College environment ; Minorities in higher education ; Discrimination in higher education ; United States ; College teachers ; United States ; Attitudes ; College students ; United States ; Attitudes ; College teachers ; Recruiting ; United States ; Universities and colleges ; United States ; Admission ; Affirmative action programs in education ; United States ; College environment ; United States ; Minorities in higher education ; United States
    Abstract: Media, politicians, and the courts portray college campuses as divided over diversity and affirmative action. But what do students and faculty really think? This book uses a novel technique to elicit honest opinions from students and faculty and measure preferences for diversity in undergraduate admissions and faculty recruitment at seven major universities, breaking out attitudes by participants' race, ethnicity, gender, socio-economic status, and political partisanship. Scholarly excellence is a top priority everywhere, but the authors show that when students consider individual candidates, they favor members of all traditionally underrepresented groups - by race, ethnicity, gender, and socio-economic background. Moreover, there is little evidence of polarization in the attitudes of different student groups. The book reveals that campus communities are less deeply divided than they are often portrayed to be; although affirmative action remains controversial in the abstract, there is broad support for prioritizing diversity in practice.
    Note: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 16 Dec 2019)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...