ISBN:
9781839107467
Sprache:
Englisch
Seiten:
1 Online-Ressource (1 volume)
Serie:
Elgar research reviews in law
Schlagwort(e):
Constitutional law
;
Equality
;
Electronic books
Kurzfassung:
In this research review, Rebecca E. Zietlow identifies and gives invaluable context to the most important scholarly contributions on the topic of constitutional law and equality. While much of the scholarship around constitutional equality focuses on court enforcement of the Equal Protection Clause, the story of constitutional equality is not just about legal advocacy, but political action in an increasingly diverse nation. The future of constitutional equality depends less on legal arguments before courts than on political advocacy for social and economic change
Beschreibung / Inhaltsverzeichnis:
Recommended readings (Machine generated): 1 R. Richard Banks (2001), 'Race-based Suspect Selection and Color blind Equal Protection and Doctrine and Discourse Smith', UCLA Law Review, 48, 1075-124 -- 2 Mario L. Barnes, Erwin Chemerinsky and TrinaJones (2010), 'A Post-Race Equal Protection?', 98, Georgetown Law Journal, 967-1004 -- 3 Derrick A. Bell, Jr. (1980), 'Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma', 93 (3), January, Harvard Law Review', 518-33 -- 4 Derrick A. Bell, Jr. (1985), 'The Supreme Court, 1984 Term - Forward: The Civil Rights Chronicles', 99 (3), January, Harvard Law Review' -- 5 Bethany R. Berger (1961), 'Reconciling Equal Protection and Federal Indian Law', California Law Review, 98, 1165-97 -- 6 Alexander M. Bickel (1961), 'The Supreme Court, 1960 Term - Forward: The Passive Virtues', Harvard Law Review, 70, 40-79 -- 7 Charles L. Black, Jr. (1960), 'The Lawfulness of the Segregation Decisions', Yale Law Review, 69, 421-30 -- 8 Maggie Blackhawk (2019), 'Federal Indian Law as Paradigm Within Public Law', Harvard Law Review, 132 (7), May, 1,787-877 -- 9 Paul Brest, (1976), 'Foreword: In Defense of the Antidiscrimination Principle', Harvard Law Review, 90, January, 1-55 -- 10 Archibold Cox (1966), 'The Supreme Court 1965 Term Foreword: Constitutional Adjudication and the Promotion of Human Rights', Harvard Law Review, 80 (1), November, 91-272 -- 11 John Hart Ely (1978), 'Toward a Representation-Reinforcing Model of Judicial Review', Maryland Law Review, 37 (3), 451-87 -- 12 Owen Fiss (1976), 'Groups and the Equal Protection Clause', Philosophy and Public Affairs, 5, 107-77 -- 13 Peter Gabel and Duncan Kennedy (1984), 'Roll Over Beethoven', Stanford Law Review, 1-55 -- 14 Marc Gallanter (1974), 'Why the Haves Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change', Law and Society Review, 9, 95-160 -- 15 Risa Goluboff (2001), 'The Thirteenth Amendment and the Lost Origins of Civil Rights', Duke Law Journal, 50, 1609-84 -- 16 Neil Gotanda (1991), 'A Critique of Our Constitution is Color-blind', Stanford Law Review, 44 (1), 1-68 -- 17 Gerald Gunther (1972), 'Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection', Harvard Law Review, 86, 1-48 -- 18 Charles R. Lawrence III (1987), 'The Id, the Ego, and Equal Protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism', Stanford Law Review, 39, 317- -- 19 Ian F. Haney López (1994), 'The Social Construction of Race: Some Observations on Illusion, Fabrication, and Choice', Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 29, 1-62 -- 20 Kenneth L. Karst (1977), 'Foreword: Equal Citizenship Under the Fourteenth Amendment', Harvard Law Review, 91, 1-44 -- 21 Michael Klarman (1991), 'An Interpretive History of Modern Equal Protection', Michigan Law Review, 90, 213-316
Beschreibung / Inhaltsverzeichnis:
22 Corinna Barrett Lain (2012), 'Upside-down Judicial Review', The Georgetown Law Journal, 101, 113-83 -- 23 Mari J. Matsuda (1987), 'Looking to the Bottom: Critical Legal Studies and Reparations', Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 22 (2), 323-400 -- 24 Juan F. Perea (1995), 'Ethnicity and the Constitution: Beyond the Black and White Binary Constitution', William and Mary Law Review, 36, 571-612 -- 25 Christopher Schmidt (2008), 'Brown and the Colorblind Constitution', Cornell Law Review, 94, 203-38 -- 26 Reva Siegel (2003), 'Equality Talk: Antisubordination and Anticlassification Values in Constitutional Struggles over Brown', Harvard Law Review, 117, 1470-3 -- 27 Jacobus tenBroek and Joseph Tussman (1949), 'The Equal Protection of the Laws', California Law Review, 37, 341- -- 28 Mark Tushnet (2000), 'Against Judicial Supremacy', in Taking the Constitution Away From the Courts, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, Chapter 1, 6-32 -- 29 Herbert Wechsler (1959), 'Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law', Harvard Law Review, 73 (1), November, 1-35 -- 30 J. Harvie Wilkinson III (1975), 'The Supreme Court, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Three Faces of Constitutional Equality', 61 (5), Virginia Law Review, 945-1018 -- 31 Patricia J. Williams, 'Alchemical Notes: Reconstructing Ideals from Deconstructing Rights', Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 22 (2), Spring, 401-34 -- 32 Katharine T. Bartlett (1990), 'Feminist Legal Methods', Harvard Law Review, 103, 829-88 -- 33 Mary E. Becker (1987), 'Prince Charming: Abstract Equality', Supreme Court Review, 201-47 -- 34 Ruth Colker (1986), 'Anti-Subordination above All: Sex, Race, and Equal Protection', New York University Law Review, 61, 1003- -- 35 Kimberle Crenshaw (1989), 'Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics', The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139-67 -- 36 Kimberle Crenshaw (1991), 'Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color', Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-99 -- 37 David Cruz (2002), 'Disestablishing Sex and Gender', California Law Review, 90, 997-1086 -- 38 Martha Albertson Fineman (1992), 'The Neutered Mother', University of Miami Law Review, 46 (3), 653-69 -- 39 Cary Franklin (2010), 'The Anti-Stereotyping Principle in Constitutional Sex Discrimination Law', New York University Law Review, 85 (1), 83-173 -- 40 Ruth Bader Ginsburg (1975), 'Gender and the Constitution', University of Cincinnati Law Review, 44, 1-42
Beschreibung / Inhaltsverzeichnis:
41 Angela P. Harris (1990), 'Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory', Stanford Law Review, 42, 581-616 -- 42 Pauli Murray (1971), 'Economic and Educational Inequality Based on Sex: An Overview', Valparaiso University Law Review, 5 (2), 237-80 -- 43 Catharine A. MacKinnon (1991), 'Reflections on Sex Equality Under Law', Yale Law Journal, 100, 1281-328 -- 44 Reva B. Siegel (2007), 'Sex Equality Arguments for Reproductive Rights: Their Critical Basis and Evolving Constitutional Expression', Emory Law Journal, 56, 815-42 -- LIBERTY AND EQUALITY - LGBTQ RIGHTS -- 45 William Araiza (2019), 'Animus and Its Discontents', Florida Law Review, 71, 155-216 -- 46 Scott L. Cummings and Douglas NeJaime (2010), 'Lawyering for Marriage Equality', UCLA Law Review, 57, 1235-331 -- 47 William N. Eskridge, Jr. (2000), 'No Promo Homo: The Sedimentation of Antigay Discourse and the Channelling Effect of Judicial Review', NYU Law Review, 75 (5), November, 1327-411 -- 48 Katie Eyer (2018), 'The Canon of Rational Basis Review', Notre Dame Law Review, 93, 1317-70 -- 49 Kenji Yoshino (2011), 'The New Equal Protection', Harvard Law Review, 124, 747-803 -- 50 Frank I. Michelman (1969), 'The Supreme Court, 1968 Term - Foreword: On Protecting the Poor Through the Fourteenth Amendment', Harvard Law Review, 83 (1), November, 7-282 -- 51 Julie A. Nice (2008), 'No Scrutiny Whatsoever; Deconstitutionalization of Poverty Law, Dual Rules of Law, and Dialogic Default', Fordham Urban Law Journal, XXXV (3), 329-35 -- 52 Michael J. Klarman (1996), 'Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions', Virginia Law Review, 82, 1-67 -- 53 Martha Albertson Fineman (2008), 'The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition', Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20, 1-23 -- 54 Daryl J. Levinson (2012), 'Rights and Votes', Yale Law Journal, 121, 1286-363 -- 55 Lawrence Gene Sager (1978), 'Fair Measure: The Legal Status of Underenforced Constitutional Norms', Harvard Law Review, 91 (6), April, 1212-64 -- 56 Robert C. Post and Reva B. Siegel (2000), 'Equal Protection by Law: Federal Anti-Discrimination Legislation after Morrison and Kimel', Yale Law Journal, 110, 441-526 -- 57 Robert C. Post and Reva B. Siegel, 'Legislative Constitutionalism and Section Five Power: Policentric Interpretations of the Family and Medical Leave Act', Yale Law Journal, 112 (8), 1943-2059 -- 58 Reva Siegel and Robert Post (2004), 'Popular Constitutionalism, Departmentalism and Judicial Supremacy', California Law Review, 92, 1027-43
Beschreibung / Inhaltsverzeichnis:
59 Rebecca E. Zietlow (2008), 'The Judicial Restraint of the Warren Court (and Why it Matters)', Ohio State Law Journal, 69, 255-94 -- 60 William C. Carter (2007), 'Race, Rights, and the Thirteenth Amendment: Defining the Badges and Incidents of Slavery', UC Davis Law Review, 40, 1311-79 -- 61 Jacobus tenBroek (1951), 'Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States: Consummation to Abolition and Key to the Fourteenth Amendment', California Law Review, 39 (2), June, 171-203 -- 62 Rebecca E. Zietlow (2010), 'Free At Last! Anti-Subordination and the Thirteenth Amendment', Boston University Law Review, 90, 255-312 -- 63 Rebecca E. Zietlow (2016), 'A Positive Right to Free Labor', Seattle University Law Review, 39, 859-99 -- 64 Evan C. Zoldan (2017), 'The Equal Protection Component of Legislative Generality', Richmond Law Review, 51 (2), 489-551
Anmerkung:
The recommended readings are available in the print version, or may be available via the link to your library's holdings
,
Includes bibliographical references and index
Permalink
