Language:
English
Pages:
1 Online-Ressource (40 pages)
Parallel Title:
Erscheint auch als Krafft, Caroline What can we Learn from Pre-Primary Quality Assurance Systems? Evidence from the Arab Republic of Egypt
Keywords:
Curriculum and Instruction
;
Education Policy
;
Kindergarten Achievement
;
Pre-Primary School
;
Primary School Performance
;
School Quality Evaluation Tool
;
Teacher Quality
;
Teacher Training
Abstract:
Quality assurance systems have been implemented or are under development in a number of low- and middle-income countries in an effort to observe the quality of education and deploy targeted measures to improve quality. This paper shares lessons learned on the potential ability of quality assurance systems to observe quality and inform action, drawing on data from a pre-primary quality assurance system in the Arab Republic of Egypt. A nationally representative study of kindergarten classrooms was conducted, using a detailed diagnostic research tool administered by independent enumerators from a data collection firm. A subsample of these kindergarten classrooms was randomly assigned to also be observed through a short quality assurance system tool, half of them by independent enumerators, and the other half by the existing cadre of government kindergarten supervisors. The quality assurance system tool was developed for scale and financial sustainability; thus, it could be administered in roughly one-third of the time of the diagnostic tool, at one-third of the cost. Overall, the results illustrate that at the national level, the quality assurance system tool can identify important areas for improvement, and thus inform broad policy actions. Further, the results are consistent whether an independent data collection firm or a government kindergarten supervisor acted as enumerator, suggesting that quality assurance system data collection efforts can be embedded within ministries of education and implemented in a regular and sustainable manner. At the school and teacher level, however, there were several areas where the quality assurance system data were inconsistent with the diagnostic data. This underscores how quality assurance systems are best used as a formative system, a starting point for quality enhancement, and not as a summative system that directly targets, punishes, or rewards specific schools
DOI:
10.1596/1813-9450-10482
URL:
Deutschlandweit zugänglich
Permalink
