Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Language: German
    Pages: 331 S. , 30 cm
    Additional Information: Rezensiert in Jakóbiec, Wojciech [Rezension von: Institute for East Asian Studies (ed.), Overview of East Asian studies in Central and Eastern Europe] 2004
    Series Statement: Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften 48
    Series Statement: Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften
    Keywords: Wissenschaft ; Ostasienwissenschaften ; Forschungsinstitut ; Wissenschaftler ; Forschungsbericht ; Mittel- und osteuropäische Länder Ungarn ; Polen ; Russische Föderation ; Ukraine ; Wissenschaften ; Ostasienforschung ; Forschungsinstitut ; Wissenschaftler/Forscher ; Forschungsbericht ; Mitteleuropa ; Osteuropa ; Ungarn ; Polen ; Russland ; Ukraine ; Bibliografie ; Ostasien ; Forschung ; Mitteleuropa ; Ostasien ; Forschung ; Osteuropa
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISBN: 3-921469-48-1
    Language: German
    Pages: 125 S. : , Ill., graph. Darst.
    Series Statement: Institut für Asienkunde 〈Hamburg〉: Mitteilungen des Instituts für Asienkunde, Hamburg 97
    DDC: 307.120952
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Stadsplanning ; Städtebau ; Stadtplanung ; City planning ; Land use, Urban ; Stadtplanung. ; Japan ; Japan. ; Stadtplanung
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Associated volumes
    In:  Japan 2012 (2012), Seite 205-237 | year:2012 | pages:205-237
    ISBN: 978-3-9812131-4-0
    Language: German
    Pages: 33 Seiten
    Titel der Quelle: Japan 2012
    Publ. der Quelle: 2012
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2012), Seite 205-237
    Angaben zur Quelle: year:2012
    Angaben zur Quelle: pages:205-237
    DDC: 302
    Keywords: Geschichte 2011-2012 ; Japan ; Naturkatastrophe ; Reaktorunfall ; Risikobewusstsein
    Abstract: The Tsunami and Nuclear Disaster 2011 in Japan: The Handling of the (Residual) Risk Are so called natural disasters really »natural«? Or are they just as equally (or even specifically) »man-made«? If so, then their outcomes can be seen as risks. This article focuses on how (residual) risks were handled in the case of the 2011 »Great Eastern Japan Earthquake« (Higashi Nihon Daishinsai) with reference to risk theory and empirical research, including recent discourses about »Fukushima« and »(the) Japan(ese)«. How are (residual) risks to be evaluated? How are they perceived? Under which conditions are they taken and legitimized? Which lessons are learned from experiences with risks? Initially, I present discourses and options related to the term »risk«. This forms the basis for the main part of the article, which focuses on an analysis of the 2011 tsunami and nuclear disaster. Finally, I conclude with a discussion of how (residual) risks were handled, the systemic nature of vulnerability in the case of Japan, and the lessons which can be learned.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Associated volumes
    In:  Japan 2012 (2012), Seite 205-237 | year:2012 | pages:205-237
    ISBN: 978-3-9812131-4-0
    Language: German
    Pages: 33 Seiten
    Titel der Quelle: Japan 2012
    Publ. der Quelle: 2012
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2012), Seite 205-237
    Angaben zur Quelle: year:2012
    Angaben zur Quelle: pages:205-237
    DDC: 302
    Keywords: Geschichte 2011-2012 ; Japan ; Naturkatastrophe ; Reaktorunfall ; Risikobewusstsein
    Abstract: The Tsunami and Nuclear Disaster 2011 in Japan: The Handling of the (Residual) Risk Are so called natural disasters really »natural«? Or are they just as equally (or even specifically) »man-made«? If so, then their outcomes can be seen as risks. This article focuses on how (residual) risks were handled in the case of the 2011 »Great Eastern Japan Earthquake« (Higashi Nihon Daishinsai) with reference to risk theory and empirical research, including recent discourses about »Fukushima« and »(the) Japan(ese)«. How are (residual) risks to be evaluated? How are they perceived? Under which conditions are they taken and legitimized? Which lessons are learned from experiences with risks? Initially, I present discourses and options related to the term »risk«. This forms the basis for the main part of the article, which focuses on an analysis of the 2011 tsunami and nuclear disaster. Finally, I conclude with a discussion of how (residual) risks were handled, the systemic nature of vulnerability in the case of Japan, and the lessons which can be learned.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...