Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Book
    Book
    Oakland, California : University of California Press
    ISBN: 9780520303225 , 9780520303232
    Language: English
    Pages: xiv, 325 Seiten , 1 Illustration, Diagramme
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als Cech, Erin A., 1982- Trouble with passion
    DDC: 306.3/60973
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Arbeitszufriedenheit ; Karriereplanung ; Persönlichkeitspsychologie ; Industriesoziologie ; USA ; Job satisfaction ; Self-realization ; Equality ; Arbeitszufriedenheit ; Karriereplanung ; Persönlichkeitspsychologie ; Industriesoziologie
    Abstract: "Probing the ominous side of career advice to "follow your passion," this data-driven study explains how the passion principle fails us and perpetuates inequality by class, gender, and race; and it suggests how we can reconfigure our relationships to paid work. "Follow your passion" is a popular mantra for career decision-making in the United States. Passion-seeking seems like a promising path for avoiding the potential drudgery of a life of paid work, but this "passion principle"-seductive as it is-does not universally translate. The Trouble with Passion reveals the significant downside of the passion principle: the concept helps culturally legitimize and reproduce an exploited, overworked white-collar labor force and broadly serves to reinforce class, race, and gender segregation and inequality. Grounding her investigation in the paradoxical tensions between capitalism's demand for ideal workers and our cultural expectations for self-expression, sociologist Erin A. Cech draws on interviews that follow students from college into the workforce, surveys of US workers, and experimental data to explain why the passion principle is such an attractive, if deceptive, career decision-making mantra, particularly for the college educated. Passion-seeking presumes middle-class safety nets and springboards and penalizes first-generation and working-class young adults who seek passion without them. The ripple effects of this mantra undermine the promise of college as a tool for social and economic mobility. The passion principle also feeds into a culture of overwork, encouraging white-collar workers to tolerate precarious employment and gladly sacrifice time, money, and leisure for work they are passionate about. And potential employers covet, but won't compensate, passion among job applicants. This book asks, What does it take to center passion in career decisions? Who gets ahead and who gets left behind by passion-seeking? The Trouble with Passion calls for citizens, educators, college administrators, and industry leaders to reconsider how we think about good jobs and, by extension, good lives."
    Note: Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 305-320
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISBN: 9780226820118 , 9780226820156
    Language: English
    Pages: ix, 248 Seiten
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als Blair-Loy, Mary Misconceiving merit
    DDC: 306.4/5
    RVK:
    Keywords: Scientists Rating of ; Science Social aspects ; Work-life balance ; Scientists Attitudes ; Science teachers Attitudes ; College teachers Attitudes ; Discrimination in higher education ; Gleichberechtigung
    Abstract: Misperceiving merit, excellence, and devotion in academic STEM -- The cultural construction of merit in academic STEM -- The work devotion schema and its consequences -- Mismeasuring merit : the schema of scientific excellence as a yardstick of merit -- Defending the schema of scientific excellence, defending inequality -- The moralization of merit : consequences for scientists and science. 
    Abstract: "In Misconceiving Merit, sociologists Mary Blair-Loy and Erin A. Cech uncover the cultural foundations of a paradox. On one hand, academic science, engineering, and math revere meritocracy, a system that recognizes and rewards those with the greatest talent and dedication. At the same time, women and some racial and sexual minorities remain underrepresented and often feel unwelcome and devalued in STEM. How can academic science, which so highly values meritocracy and objectivity, produce these unequal outcomes? Blair-Loy and Cech studied more than five hundred STEM professors at a top research university to reveal how unequal and unfair outcomes can emerge alongside commitments to objectivity and excellence. The authors find that academic STEM harbors dominant cultural beliefs that not only perpetuate the mistreatment of scientists from underrepresented groups but hinder innovation. Underrepresented groups are often seen as less fully embodying merit compared to equally productive white and Asian heterosexual men, and the negative consequences of this misjudgment persist regardless of professors' actual academic productivity. Misconceiving Merit is filled with insights for higher education administrators working toward greater equity as well as for scientists and engineers striving to change entrenched patterns of inequality in STEM"--
    Note: Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 213-235
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oakland, California : University of California Press
    ISBN: 9780520972698 , 0520972694
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als Cech, Erin A., 1982- Trouble with passion
    DDC: 306.3/60973
    Keywords: Job satisfaction ; Self-realization ; Equality
    Note: Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Chicago : The University of Chicago Press | Oxford : Oxford University Press
    ISBN: 9780226820149
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 248 pages) , Illustrations (black and white).
    Series Statement: Chicago scholarship online
    DDC: 306.45
    Keywords: Scientists Rating of ; Science Social aspects ; Minorities in science ; Science ; Society & culture: general ; Education
    Abstract: Here is an incisive study showing how cultural ideas of merit in academic science produce unfair and unequal outcomes. In this book, sociologists Mary Blair-Loy and Erin A. Cech uncover the cultural foundations of a paradox. On one hand, academic science, engineering, and math revere meritocracy, a system that recognizes and rewards those with the greatest talent and dedication. At the same time, women and some racial and sexual minorities remain underrepresented and often feel unwelcome and devalued in STEM. How can academic science, which so highly values meritocracy and objectivity, produce these unequal outcomes? Blair-Loy and Cech studied more than five hundred STEM professors at a top research university to reveal how unequal and unfair outcomes can emerge alongside commitments to objectivity and excellence.
    Note: Also issued in print: 2022 , Includes bibliographical references and index
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oakland, California : University of California Press
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (1 online resource)
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als Cech, Erin A., 1982- Trouble with passion
    DDC: 306.3/60973
    Keywords: Job satisfaction ; Self-realization ; Equality ; Equality ; Job satisfaction ; Self-realization ; Electronic books
    Abstract: What is the passion principle? -- Why is the passion principle compelling? -- The privilege of passion? Passion-seeking and socioeconomic inequality among career aspirants -- The passion principle as prescriptive and explanatory narrative? How the passion principle choicewashes workforce inequalities -- Exploiting passion? The demand side of the passion principle.
    Abstract: "Probing the ominous side of career advice to "follow your passion," this data-driven study explains how the passion principle fails us and perpetuates inequality by class, gender, and race; and it suggests how we can reconfigure our relationships to paid work. "Follow your passion" is a popular mantra for career decision-making in the United States. Passion-seeking seems like a promising path for avoiding the potential drudgery of a life of paid work, but this "passion principle"-seductive as it is-does not universally translate. The Trouble with Passion reveals the significant downside of the passion principle: the concept helps culturally legitimize and reproduce an exploited, overworked white-collar labor force and broadly serves to reinforce class, race, and gender segregation and inequality. Grounding her investigation in the paradoxical tensions between capitalism's demand for ideal workers and our cultural expectations for self-expression, sociologist Erin A. Cech draws on interviews that follow students from college into the workforce, surveys of US workers, and experimental data to explain why the passion principle is such an attractive, if deceptive, career decision-making mantra, particularly for the college educated. Passion-seeking presumes middle-class safety nets and springboards and penalizes first-generation and working-class young adults who seek passion without them. The ripple effects of this mantra undermine the promise of college as a tool for social and economic mobility. The passion principle also feeds into a culture of overwork, encouraging white-collar workers to tolerate precarious employment and gladly sacrifice time, money, and leisure for work they are passionate about. And potential employers covet, but won't compensate, passion among job applicants. This book asks, What does it take to center passion in career decisions? Who gets ahead and who gets left behind by passion-seeking? The Trouble with Passion calls for citizens, educators, college administrators, and industry leaders to reconsider how we think about good jobs and, by extension, good lives"--
    Note: Includes bibliographical references and index
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    ISBN: 9780226820149
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (240 p.) , 15 line drawings, 9 tables
    DDC: 306.45
    RVK:
    Keywords: College teachers Attitudes ; Discrimination in higher education ; Science teachers Attitudes ; Science Social aspects ; Scientists Rating of ; Scientists Attitudes ; Work-life balance ; EDUCATION / General
    Abstract: An incisive study showing how cultural ideas of merit in academic science produce unfair and unequal outcomes. In Misconceiving Merit, sociologists Mary Blair-Loy and Erin A. Cech uncover the cultural foundations of a paradox. On one hand, academic science, engineering, and math revere meritocracy, a system that recognizes and rewards those with the greatest talent and dedication. At the same time, women and some racial and sexual minorities remain underrepresented and often feel unwelcome and devalued in STEM. How can academic science, which so highly values meritocracy and objectivity, produce these unequal outcomes? Blair-Loy and Cech studied more than five hundred STEM professors at a top research university to reveal how unequal and unfair outcomes can emerge alongside commitments to objectivity and excellence. The authors find that academic STEM harbors dominant cultural beliefs that not only perpetuate the mistreatment of scientists from underrepresented groups but hinder innovation. Underrepresented groups are often seen as less fully embodying merit compared to equally productive white and Asian heterosexual men, and the negative consequences of this misjudgment persist regardless of professors’ actual academic productivity. Misconceiving Merit is filled with insights for higher education administrators working toward greater equity as well as for scientists and engineers striving to change entrenched patterns of inequality in STEM
    Note: Frontmatter , Contents , Tables and Figures , One. Misperceiving Merit, Excellence, and Devotion in Academic STEM , Two. The Cultural Construction of Merit in Academic STEM , Three. The Work Devotion Schema and Its Consequences , Four. Mismeasuring Merit: The Schema of Scientific Excellence as a Yardstick of Merit , Five. Defending the Schema of Scientific Excellence, Defending Inequality , Six. The Moralization of Merit: Consequences for Scientists and Science , Acknowledgments , Appendix , Notes , References , Index , In English
    URL: Cover
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...