ISBN:
9780199640423
Language:
English
Pages:
1 electronic resource (245 p.)
Additional Information:
Rezensiert in Curiello, Gioacchino Apophasis and pseudonymity in Dionysius the Areopagite. ‘No longer I’. By Charles M. Stang. (Oxford Early Christian Studies.) Pp. vii+236. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. £60. 978 0 19 964042 3 2013
Additional Information:
Rezensiert in Mitralexis, Sotiris Apophasis and Pseudonymity in Dionysius the Areopagite: ‘No Longer I’ by Charles M. Stang, Oxford University Press, 2012 (ISBN 978-0-19-964042-3), vi + 236 pp., hb £62 2014
Keywords:
The Early Church
;
Christian theology
;
Christian mysticism
;
Dionysius Areopagita
;
Pseudonym
;
Apophatische Theologie
Abstract:
This book argues that the pseudonym, Dionysius the Areopagite, and the influence of Paul together constitute the best interpretive lens for understanding the Corpus Dionysiacum [CD]. This book demonstrates how Paul in fact animates the entire corpus, that the influence of Paul illuminates such central themes of the CD as hierarchy, theurgy, deification, Christology, affirmation (kataphasis) and negation (apophasis), dissimilar similarities, and unknowing. Most importantly, Paul serves as a fulcrum for the expression of a new theological anthropology, an “apophatic anthropology.” Dionysius figures Paul as the premier apostolic witness to this apophatic anthropology, as the ecstatic lover of the divine who confesses to the rupture of his self and the indwelling of the divine in Gal 2:20: “it is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me.” Building on this notion of apophatic anthropology, the book forwards an explanation for why this sixth‐century author chose to write under an apostolic pseudonym. It argues that the very practice of pseudonymous writing itself serves as an ecstatic devotional exercise whereby the writer becomes split in two and thereby open to the indwelling of the divine. Pseudonymity is on this interpretation integral and internal to the aims of the wider mystical enterprise. Thus this book aims to question the distinction between “theory” and “practice” by demonstrating that negative theology—often figured as a speculative and rarefied theory regarding the transcendence of God—is in fact best understood as a kind of asceticism, a devotional practice aiming for the total transformation of the Christian subject
Note:
English
URL:
OAPEN Library: download the publication
URL:
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
