ISBN:
9780226608594
,
9780226608761
Language:
English
Pages:
XII, 230 Seiten
,
Illustrationen, Karten
Series Statement:
Chicago series in law and society
Parallel Title:
Erscheint auch als Richland, Justin B. Cooperation without Submission
Parallel Title:
Erscheint auch als Richland, Justin Blake, 1970 - Cooperation without submission
DDC:
342.7308/72
Keywords:
Indians of North America Legal status, laws, etc
;
Indians of North America Government relations
;
Sovereignty
;
Hopi Tribe of Arizon Relations
;
Hopi Tribe of Arizona Relations
Abstract:
"Justin B. Richland continues his study of the relationship between American law and government and Native American law and tribal governance in his new manuscript Cooperation without Submission: Indigenous Jurisdictions in Native Nation-US Engagements. Richland looks at the way Native Americans and government officials talk about their relationship and seek to resolve conflicts over the extent of Native American authority in tribal lands when it conflicts with federal law and policy. The American federal government is supposed to engage in meaningful consultations with the tribes about issues that affect the tribes under long standing Federal law which accorded the federal government the responsibility of a trustee to the tribes. It requires the government to act in the best interest of the tribes and to interpret agreements with tribes in a way that respects their rights and interests. At least partly based on a patronizing view of Native Americans, the law has also sought to protect the interests of the tribes from those who might take advantage of them. In Cooperation without Submission, Richland looks closely at the language employed by both sides in consultations between tribes and government agencies focusing on the Hopi tribe but also discussing other cases. Richland shows how tribes conduct these meetings using language that demonstrates their commitment to nation-to -nation interdependency, while federal agents appear to approach these consultations with the assumption that federal l aw is supreme and ultimately authoritative"--
