Evifa-Portal

Treffer pro Seite

Treffer 1 - 3 | 3 Treffer

Sortierung

Online-Ressource

Hegel’s Dialectic (1975)

Sarlemijn, Andries

Dordrecht : Springer

zur Merkliste hinzufügen auf der Merkliste

Details

ISBN: 9789401017367

Sprache: Englisch

Seiten: Online-Ressource (201p) , digital

Ausgabe: Springer eBook Collection. Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Serie: Sovietica, Publications and Monographs of the Institute of East-European Studies at the University of Fribourg / Switzerland 33

Serie: Sovietica 33

Paralleltitel: Erscheint auch als

Schlagwort(e): Regional planning ; Philosophy, Modern. ; Ethnology. ; Culture. ; History.

Kurzfassung: 1 Subject Matter -- 2 Relevance -- 3 The Fate of Hegel Interpretations -- 4 Divisions -- I / Dialectic -- 1 / Dialectic of the Real -- 2 / Positive Dialectic -- 3 / The Subject Matter of Dialectical Philosophy -- II / Dialectic And Metaphysics -- 1 / ‘Metaphysics’ — A Philosophical Discipline -- 2 / Metaphysical Method in General -- 3 / Spinoza and Double Negation -- III / Dialectical Metaphysics -- 1 / Infinity -- 2 / Absolute Necessity -- 3 / Being is Thought -- Summary -- Epilogue / Hegel’s Dialectic and Contemporary Issues -- 1 Analytic and Dialectic -- 2 The Sublation of Hegel’s Dialectic -- 2.1 First Reversion -- 2.2 Second Reversion -- 2.3 Third Reversion -- 2.4 Fourth Reversion -- Concerning Notes And Abbreviations -- Notes -- Index of Names.

Kurzfassung: This book was written in 1968, and defended as a doctoral dissertation before the Philosophical Faculty at the University of Fribourg (Switzerland) in 1969. It treats of the systematic views of Hegel which led him to give to the princi ple of non-contradiction, the principle of double negation, and the principle of excluded middle, meanings which are difficult to understand. The reader will look in vain for the philosophical position of the author. A few words about the intentions which motivated the author to study and clarify Hegel's thought are therefore not out of place. In the early sixties, when occupying myself with the history of Marxist philosophy, I discovered that the representatives of the logical-positivist tra dition were not alone in employing a principle of demarcation; that those of the dialectical Marxist tradition were also using such a principle ('self-move ment') as a foundation of a scientific philosophy and as a means to delimit unscientific ideas. I aimed at a clear conception of this principle in order to be able to judge whether, and to what extent, it accords with the foundations of the analytical method. In this endeavor I encountered two problems: (1) What is to be understood by 'analytical method' cannot be ascertained un equivocally.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1736-7

URL: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

URL: lizenzpflichtig

Permalink

Bibliothek	Standort	Signatur	Band/Heft/Jahr	Verfügbarkeit

Andere fanden auch interessant ...

Online-Ressource

MPI Ethno. Forsch.

Online-Ressource

Vladimir Solovyev and Max Scheler: Attempt at a Comparative Interpretation : A Contribution to the History of Phenomenology (1975)

Dahm, Helmut

Dordrecht : Springer

zur Merkliste hinzufügen auf der Merkliste

Details

ISBN: 9789401017480

Sprache: Englisch

Seiten: Online-Ressource (344p) , digital

Ausgabe: Springer eBook Collection. Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Serie: Sovietica, Publications and Monographs of the Institute of East-European Studies at the University of Fribourg / Switzerland 34

Serie: Sovietica 34

Paralleltitel: Erscheint auch als

Schlagwort(e): Regional planning ; Ethnology. ; Culture.

Kurzfassung: I. The Idea of Philosophy -- I. The Concept of “Something” and of the “Absolute Being” -- II. Solovyev’s “Absolute Being” and Scheler’s “The Eternally Astonishing Roofing of the Abyss of Absolute Nothing” -- III. Summary -- II. Solovyev’s Idea of “Integral Knowledge” and Scheler’s “System of Conformity” -- I. The Meta-Anthropological Aspect -- II. The Historical Aspect -- III. The Epistemological Aspect -- III. The Relation Between Religion and Metaphysics -- I. Typology -- II. The Problems -- IV. Systematic Philosophy -- I. “Organic Logic” -- II. “Organic Metaphysics” -- III. “Organic Ethics” -- IV. The Philosophy of Eros -- V. Special Problems -- I. The Feminist Issue and the Idea of God -- II. On the Question of Influence -- VI. Retrospect -- VII. Russian Philosophy from Solovyev to Shestov — Revision of a Soviet Taboo -- I. The Argument over Russian Philosophy -- II. From Theosophy to Phenomenology -- III. The New Religious Philosophy -- VIII. Soviet Judgement and Criticism of Solovyev -- I. The Great Soviet Encyclopaedia, 1 st edition 1947 -- II. The Great Soviet Encyclopaedia, 2nd edition 1957 -- III. Against Contemporary Falsifiers of the History of Russian Philosophy, 1960 -- IV. History of Russian Philosophy, 1961 -- IX. Soviet Appropriation of Scheler’s Phenomenology -- Notes -- Bibliography — A Summary of the Works by and on Vladimir Solovyev and Max Scheler -- Index of Names.

Kurzfassung: This comparative study of the works of Vladimir Solovyev and Max Scheler explores some of the areas in which their thoughts seem to bear a direct relation to one another. The author shows, however, that such a correlation is not based on any factual influence of the earlier Russian on the later philosophy of Scheler. The similarities in their spiritual and philosophical development are significant as the author demonstrates in his chapter on systematic philosophy. This comparison is not just of historical interest. It is meant to contri bute to a better understanding between the East and the West. The author provides a basis for future discussions by establishing a common area of inquiry and by demonstrating a convergence of viewpoints already in regard to these problems. The author also discusses the potential role of the ideas of Solovyev and Scheler in the formation of a consciousness which he sees now emerging in the Soviet Union - a consciousness critical of any misrepresentation both of non-Marxist Russian philosophy as well as of Western philosophy in general. In regard to the translation itself, three things should be mentioned. First of all, the distinction between the important German words "Sein" and "Seiendes" is often difficult to preserve in translation. Unless otherwise noted all references to "being" refer to "Seiendes." Second, the abbreviations of the works of Solovyev and Scheler used in the footnotes are clarified in the summary of the works of these authors found on page 31Off. below.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1748-0

URL: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

URL: lizenzpflichtig

Permalink

Bibliothek	Standort	Signatur	Band/Heft/Jahr	Verfügbarkeit

Andere fanden auch interessant ...

Online-Ressource

MPI Ethno. Forsch.

Online-Ressource

The Soviet Critique of Neopositivism : The History and Structure of the Critique of Logical Positivism and Related Doctrines by Soviet Philosophers in the Years 1947-1967 (1975)

Boeselager, Wolfhard F.

Dordrecht : Springer

zur Merkliste hinzufügen auf der Merkliste

Details

ISBN: 9789401017510

Sprache: Englisch

Seiten: Online-Ressource (164p) , digital

Ausgabe: Springer eBook Collection. Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Serie: Sovietica, Publications and Monographs of the Institute of East-European Studies at the University of Fribourg / Switzerland 35

Serie: Sovietica 35

Paralleltitel: Erscheint auch als

Schlagwort(e): Regional planning ; Ethnology. ; Culture.

Kurzfassung: I: Introduction -- 1. The Object of this Study -- 2. The Significance of this Study -- 3. Some Difficulties -- 4. On Method -- 5. The Questions -- II: First Historical Approach: Positivism and Neopositivism -- 1. The Notion of Positivism -- 2. The History of Early Positivism (pre-1921) -- 3. The History of Neopositivism (post-1921) -- III: Second Historical Approach: Notions of Philosophy and Relationships to Positivism in Marx, Engels and the Earlier Soviet Philosophers (up to World War II) -- l.Marx -- 2. Engels -- 3. Lenin -- 4. From Lenin to Stalinism -- IV: The Soviet Critique of Neopositivism -- 1. Systematic Background -- 2. Historical Background -- 3. Igor Sergeevi? Narskij -- 4. Vladimir Sergeevi? Švyrev -- 5. Pavel Vasil’evi? Kopnin -- 6. Various other Soviet Authors -- 7. Outcome -- V: Concluding Remarks -- References -- Index of Names -- Index of Subjects.

Kurzfassung: The nrst of the people to be thanked for their help during the composition of this work is Professor I.M. Bochenski, under whom I had the good fortune to study for an extended period of time. Without his help, it is doubtful that this work would have been writt"l1 at all. Among the other professors who helped along the way, I would like to cite in particular Professors A.F. Utz, M.D. Philippe and N. Luyten of the University of Fribourg. Many friends were present at the birth of the ideas contained in this book. By naming K.G. Ballestrem, T.l. Blakeley and M.F. Gagern, I do not want to slight any of the rest. It was A. Spiekermann in Hollinghofen who saw to it that other preoccupations did not rob me of all the time needed for the study of the subject-matter and to the composition of this treatise. Of particular help in getting sources from the libraries of the world were Miss Lifschitz of the Institute of East-European Studies and Mr. Uldry of the Cantonal Library in Fribourg, Switzerland. Finally, my patient typist, Mrs. Frey in Munster, deserves special mention for her beautiful work.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1751-0

URL: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

URL: lizenzpflichtig

Permalink

Bibliothek	Standort	Signatur	Band/Heft/Jahr	Verfügbarkeit

Andere fanden auch interessant ...

Online-Ressource

MPI Ethno. Forsch.

Treffer 1 - 3 | 3 Treffer