Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 2005-2009  (1)
  • Cham : Springer International Publishing
  • Imprint: Springer VS
  • Washington, D.C : The World Bank
  • Social sciences
Datasource
Material
Language
Years
Year
Author, Corporation
  • 1
    Language: English
    Pages: Online-Ressource (1 online resource (58 p.))
    Edition: Online-Ausg. World Bank E-Library Archive
    Parallel Title: Bruhn, Miriam Good, Bad, And Ugly Colonial Activities
    Keywords: Country Population Profiles ; Demographics ; Economic Theory & Research ; Gross domestic product ; Health, Nutrition and Population ; Human capital ; Income inequality ; Labor force ; Native population ; Policy research ; Policy research working paper ; Population Policies ; Population density ; Progress ; Social sciences ; Country Population Profiles ; Demographics ; Economic Theory & Research ; Gross domestic product ; Health, Nutrition and Population ; Human capital ; Income inequality ; Labor force ; Native population ; Policy research ; Policy research working paper ; Population Policies ; Population density ; Progress ; Social sciences ; Country Population Profiles ; Demographics ; Economic Theory & Research ; Gross domestic product ; Health, Nutrition and Population ; Human capital ; Income inequality ; Labor force ; Native population ; Policy research ; Policy research working paper ; Population Policies ; Population density ; Progress ; Social sciences
    Abstract: Levels of economic development vary widely within countries in the Americas. This paper argues that part of this variation has its roots in the colonial era. Colonizers engaged in different economic activities in different regions of a country, depending on local conditions. Some activities were "bad" in the sense that they depended heavily on the exploitation of labor and created extractive institutions, while "good" activities created inclusive institutions. The authors show that areas with bad colonial activities have lower gross domestic product per capita today than areas with good colonial activities. Areas with high pre-colonial population density also do worse today. In particular, the positive effect of "good" activities goes away in areas with high pre-colonial population density. The analysis attributes this to the "ugly" fact that colonizers used the pre-colonial population as an exploitable resource. The intermediating factor between history and current development appears to be institutional differences across regions and not income inequality or the current ethnic composition of the population
    URL: Volltext  (Deutschlandweit zugänglich)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...