Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISBN: 9789400925380
    Language: English
    Pages: Online-Ressource (320p) , digital
    Edition: Springer eBook Collection. Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
    Series Statement: Philosophy and Medicine 34
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Keywords: Philosophy (General) ; medicine Philosophy ; Medical ethics ; Religion (General) ; Ethics ; Religion. ; Medicine—Philosophy. ; Bioethics.
    Abstract: I: A Prologue -- Some Basic Considerations on Moral Teaching in the Church -- II: The Philosophical Foundations -- Nature and Human Nature as the Norm in Medical Ethics -- The Human Person and Philosophy of Medicine: A Response to William A. Wallace -- Philosophical Foundations of Catholic Medical Morals (translated by E. E. Langan) -- Moral Disagreements in Catholicism: A Commentary on Wallace, Schüller, and Thomasma -- III: The Theological Foundations -- “Catholic” Medical Moral Theology? -- “Theological” Medical Morality? A Response to Joseph Fuchs -- Theological Argument and Hermeneutics in Bioethics -- The Doctrinal Starting Points for Theology and Hermeneutics in Bioethics: A Response to Klaus Demmer -- A Brief History of Medical Ethics from the Roman Catholic Perspective: Comments on the Essays of Fuchs, Cahill, Demmer, and Hellwig -- IV: Pluralism within the Church -- Pluralism within the Church -- One Church, Plural Theologies -- Is Ethics One or Many? -- Can Ethics Be Contradictory?: A Response to Gerard J. Hughes, S. J. -- V: Pluralism in Society -- Religious Pluralism and Social Policy: The Case of Health Care -- Consensus, Moral Witness, and Health-Care Issues: A Dialogue with J. Bryan Hehir -- Notes on a Catholic Vision of Pluralism -- A Brief Commentary on “Notes on a Catholic Vision of Pluralism” -- VI: Agapeistic Medical Ethics -- The Art and Science of Medicine -- Agape and Ethics: Some Reflections on Medical Morals from a Catholic Christian Perspective -- Notes on Contributors.
    Abstract: CATHOLIC PERSPECTIVES AND CONTEMPORARY MEDICAL MORALS A Catholic perspective on medical morals antedates the current world­ wide interest in medical and biomedical ethics by many centuries[5]. Discussions about the moral status of the fetus, abortion, contraception, and sterilization can be found in the writings of the Fathers and Doctors of the Church. Teachings on various aspects of medical morals were scattered throughout the penitential books of the early medieval church and later in more formal treatises when moral theology became recog­ nized as a distinct discipline. Still later, medical morality was incorpor­ ated into the many pastoral works on medicine. Finally, in the contemporary period, works that strictly focus on medical ethics are produced by Catholic moral theologians who have special interests in matters medical. Moreover, this long tradition of teaching has been put into practice in the medical moral directives governing the operation of hospitals under Catholic sponsorship. Catholic hospitals were monitored by Ethics Committees long before such committees were recommended by the New Jersey Court in the Karen Ann Quinlan case or by the President's Commission in 1983 ([8, 9]). Underlying the Catholic moral tradition was the use of the casuistic method, which since the 17th and 18th centuries was employed by Catholic moralists to study and resolve concrete clinical ethical dilem­ mas. The history of casuistry is of renewed interest today when the case method has become so widely used in the current revival of interest in medical ethics[ll].
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers | Dordrecht : Imprint: Springer
    ISBN: 9780585274065
    Language: English
    Pages: Online-Ressource (xiv, 349 p) , ill
    Edition: Springer eBook Collection. Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
    Series Statement: Philosophy and Medicine 33
    Keywords: Philosophy (General) ; medicine Philosophy ; Internal medicine ; Pediatrics ; Medical ethics ; Medicine—Philosophy. ; Pediatrics. ; Internal medicine. ; Bioethics.
    Abstract: Children’s Health as a Social and Political Issue -- Child Health and Public Policy -- Comments on Barbara Starfield’s ‘Child Health and Public Policy’ -- Development of the U.S. Federal Role in Children’s Health Care: A Critical Appraisal -- American Social and Political Thought and the Federal Role in Child Health Care -- Children as Research Subjects -- When is the Risk Minimal Enough for Children to be Research Subjects? -- Children, Illness, and Death -- Death and Children’S Literature: Charlotte’s Web and the Dying Child -- Charlotte the Spider, Socrates, and the Problem of Evil -- Children’s Conceptions of Illness and Death -- Terminally Ill Children and Treatment Choices: a Reply to Gareth Matthews -- Children’s and Parents’ Roles in Medical Decisionmaking -- Children and Adolescents: Their Right to Decide About Their Own Health Care -- Children and Health Care Decisionmaking: A Reply to Angela Holder -- Children’s Competence for Health Care Decisionmaking -- Consent and Decisional Authority in Children’s Health Care Decisionmaking: A Reply to Dan Brock -- Questions Parents Should Resist -- Taking the Family Seriously: Beyond Best Interests -- The Pediatrician’s Role: Theory and Practice -- “Not Miniature Men and Women”: Abraham Jacobi’s Vision of a New Medical Specialty a Century Ago -- The Development of Pediatrics as a Specialty -- The Good Doctor and the Medical Care of Children -- Comments on John Ladd’s ‘the Good Doctor and the Medical Care of Children’ -- Government by Case Anecdote or Case Advocacy: A Pediatrician’s View -- Advocacy: Some Reflections on an Ambiguous Term -- Loving the Chronically Ill Child: A Pediatrician’s Perspective -- Love and the Physician: A Reply to Thomas Irons.
    Abstract: Before a separate Department of Medical Humanities was formed, the editors of this volume were faculty members of the Department of Pediatrics at our medical school. Colleagues daily spoke of the moral and social problems of children's health care. Our offices were near the examining rooms where children had their bone-marrow procedures done. Since this is a painful test, we often heard them cry. The hospital floor where the sickest children stayed was also nearby. The physicians, nurses, and social workers believed that children's health care needs were not being met and that more could and should be done. Fewer resources are available for a child than for an adult with a comparable illness, they said. These experiences prompted us to prepare this volume and to ask whether children do get their fair share of the health care dollar. Since the question "What kind of health care do we owe to our children?" is complex, responses should be rooted in many disciplines. These include philosophy, law, public policy and, of course, the health professions. Representing all of these disciplines, contributors to this volume reflect on moral and social issues in children's health care. The last hundred years have brought great changes in health care tor children. The specialty of pediatrics developed during this period, and with it, a new group of advocates for children's health care. Women's suffrage gave a political boost to the recognition of children's special health needs.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Dordrecht : Sold and distributed in the U.S.A. and Canada by Kluwer Academic Publishers | Dordrecht : Imprint: Springer
    ISBN: 9780585275895
    Language: English
    Pages: Online-Ressource (xv, 254 p) , ill
    Edition: Springer eBook Collection. Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
    Series Statement: Philosophy and Medicine 29
    Keywords: Philosophy (General) ; medicine Philosophy ; Medical ethics ; Medicine—Philosophy. ; Public health. ; Bioethics.
    Abstract: The Captain’s Authority: Sources and Scope -- The Physician and Authority: A Historical Appraisal -- Narrow Passageways: Nurses and Physicians in Conflict and Concert Since 1875 -- Legal Intrusions on Physician Independence -- The Authority of the Captain: Reflections on a Nautical Theme -- Sharing the Captaincy -- Team Medicine in The NICU: Ship or Flotilla of Lifeboats? -- “Ship? What Ship? I Thought I was Going to the Doctor!”: Patient-Centered Perspectives on the Health Care Team -- Who Chartered This Ship? -- Technology and Financing: Changing the Course -- The Physician And Technological Change -- Marketing Health Care: Ethical Challenge to Physicians -- Social Goals and Doctors’ Roles: Commentary on the Essays of Robert M. Cook-Deegan and Stuart F. Spicker -- Captains, Committees, and Communities -- Unshared and Shared Decision Making: Reflections on Helplessness and Healing -- Ethics Committees: Talking the Captain Through Troubled Waters.
    Abstract: "The fixed person for fixed duties, who in older societies was such a godsend, in the future ill be a public danger." Twenty years ago, a single legal metaphor accurately captured the role that American society accorded to physicians. The physician was "c- tain of the ship." Physicians were in charge of the clinic, the Operating room, and the health care team, responsible - and held accountabl- for all that happened within the scope of their supervision. This grant of responsibility carried with it a corresponding grant of authority; like the ship's captain, the physician was answerable to no one regarding the practice of his art. However compelling the metaphor, few would disagree that the mandate accorded to the medical profession by society is changing. As a result of pressures from a number of diverse directions - including technological advances, the development of new health professionals, changes in health care financing and delivery, the recent emphasis on consumer choice and patients' rights - what our society expects phy- cians to do and to be is different now. The purpose of this volume is to examine and evaluate the conceptual foundations and the moral imp- cations of that difference. Each of the twelve essays of this volume assesses the current and future validity of the "captain of the ship" metaphor from a different perspective. The essays are grouped into four sections. In Section I, Russell Maulitz explores the physician's role historically.
    Note: Description based upon print version of record
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...