Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 1980-1984  (4)
  • Shelp, Earl E.  (3)
  • Bunge, Mario
  • Dordrecht : Springer  (4)
  • Hoboken : Taylor and Francis
  • 1
    ISBN: 9789400971486
    Language: English
    Pages: Online-Ressource (332p) , digital
    Edition: Springer eBook Collection. Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
    Series Statement: Philosophy and Medicine 14
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Keywords: Philosophy (General) ; medicine Philosophy ; Medical ethics ; Medicine—Philosophy. ; Bioethics.
    Abstract: Section I / Historical Inquiries and Perspectives -- Evolution of the Patient-Physician Relationship: Antiquity Through the Renaissance -- The Legacy of Modern Anglo-American Medical Ethics: Correcting Some Misperceptions -- American Medical Ethics and the Physician-Patient Relationship -- Section II / Models of the Patient-Physician Relationship -- Veatch, May, and Models: A Critical Review and a New View -- The Case for Contract in Medical Ethics -- A Rejoinder -- Legal Models of the Patient-Physician Relation -- The Common Law as a model of the Patient-Physician Relationship: A Response to Professor Brody -- Jewish Religious Law as a Model of the Patient-Physician Relationship: A Comment on Professor Brody’s Essay -- Response to Franck and White -- Section III / Conceptual and Theoretical Analyses -- The Healing Relationship: The Architectonics of Clinical Medicine -- The Psychiatric Patient-Physician Relationship -- The Physician as Stranger: The Ethics of the Anonymous Patient-Physician Relationship -- The Internal Morality of Medicine: An Essential Dimension of the Patient-Physician Relationship -- Scope of the Therapeutic Relationship -- Section IV / Morality in the Patient-Physician Relationship -- The Physician-Patient Relationship in a Secular, Pluralist Society -- The Therapeutic Relationship: Is Moral Conduct a Necessary Condition? -- A Theological Context for the Relationship Between Patient and Physician -- Notes on Contributors.
    Abstract: The encounter between patient and physician may be characterized as the focus of medicine. As such, the patient-physician relationship, or more accurately the conduct of patients and physicians, has been the subject of considerable comment, inquiry, and debate throughout the centuries. The issues and concerns discussed, apart from those more specifically related to medical theory and therapy, range from matters of etiquette to profound questions of philosophical and moral interest. This discourse is impressive with respect both to its duration and content. Contemporary scholars and laypeople have made their contribution to these long-standing discussions. In addition, they have actively addressed those distinctively modern issues that have arisen as a result of increased medical knowledge, improved technology, and changing cultural and moral expectation. The concept of the patient-physician rela­ tionship that supposedly provides a framework for the conduct of patients and physicians seemingly has taken on a life of its own, inviolable, and subject to norms particular to it. The essays in this volume elucidate the nature of the patient-physician relationship, its character, and moral norms appropriate to it. The purpose of the collection is to enhance our understanding of that context, which many consider to be the focus of the entire medical enterprise. The con­ tributors have not engaged in apologetics, polemics, homiletics, or em­ piricism.
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Dordrecht : Springer
    ISBN: 9789400977693
    Language: English
    Pages: Online-Ressource (292p) , digital
    Edition: Springer eBook Collection. Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
    Series Statement: Philosophy and Medicine 11
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Keywords: Philosophy (General) ; medicine Philosophy ; Medical ethics ; Medicine—Philosophy. ; Bioethics.
    Abstract: Section I/Historical and Conceptual Background -- Philanthropy in Medicine: Some Historical Perspectives -- Philosophical Foundations of Beneficence -- Beneficence in an Ethics of Virtue -- Beneficence, Supererogation, and Role Duty -- Section II/Beneficence in Religious Ethics -- Jewish Ethics and Beneficence -- Roman Catholic Ethics and Beneficence -- Protestant Ethics and Beneficence -- Section III/Beneficence in Health Care -- Scope of Beneficence in Health Care -- To Benefit and Respect Persons: A Challenge for Beneficence in Health Care -- Beneficence and Health Policy: Reduction of Risk-Taking -- Altruism in Health Care -- Epilogue -- Notes on Contributors.
    Abstract: The meaning and application of the principle of beneficence to issues in health care is rarely clear or certain. Although the principle is frequently employed to justify a variety of actions and inactions, very little has been done from a conceptual point of view to test its relevance to these behaviors or to explore its relationship to other moral principles that also might be called upon to guide or justify conduct. Perhaps more than any other, the principle of benef­ icence seems particularly appropriate to contexts of health care in which two or more parties interact from positions of relative strength and weakness, advantage and need, to pursue some perceived goal. It is among those moral principles that Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress selected in their textbook on bioethics as applicable to biomedicine in general and relevant to a range of specific issues ([1], pp. 135-167). More narrowly, The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behav­ ioral Research identified beneficence as among those moral principles that have particular relevance to the conduct of research involving humans (2). Thus, the principle of beneficence is seen as pertinent to the routine delivery of health care, the discovery of new therapies, and the rationale of public policies related to health care.
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Dordrecht : Springer
    ISBN: 9789400985179
    Language: English
    Pages: Online-Ressource (244p) , digital
    Edition: Springer eBook Collection. Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
    Series Statement: Episteme, A Series in the Foundational, Methodological, Philosophical, Psychological, Sociological and Political Aspects of the Sciences, Pure and Applied 9
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Keywords: Philosophy (General) ; Science Philosophy ; Science—Philosophy.
    Abstract: I: Being -- 1. Matter Today -- 2. Materialism Today -- II: Becoming -- 3. Modes of Becoming -- 4. A Critique of Dialectics -- III: Mind -- 5. A Materialist Theory of Mind -- 6. Mind Evolving -- IV: Culture -- 7. A Materialist Concept of Culture -- 8. Popper’s Unworldly World 3 -- V: Concept -- 9. The Status of Concepts -- 10. Logic, Semantics, and Ontology -- New Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous -- Sources -- Index of Names -- Index of Subjects.
    Abstract: The word 'materialism' is ambiguous: it designates a moral doc­ trine as well as a philosophy and, indeed, an entire world view. Moral materialism is identical with hedonism, or the doctrine that humans should pursue only their own pleasure. Philosophical ma­ terialismis the view that the real worId is composed exclusively of material things. The two doctrines are logically independent: hedonism is consistent with immaterialism, and materialism is compatible with high minded morals. We shall be concerned ex­ c1usively with philosophical materialism. And we shall not confuse it with realism, or the epistemological doctrine that knowIedge, or at any rate scientific knowledge, attempts to represent reality. Philosophical materialism is not a recent fad and it is not a solid block: it is as old as philosophy and it has gone through six quite different stages. The first was ancient materialism, centered around Greek and Indian atomism. The second was the revival of the first during the 17th century. The third was 18th century ma­ terialism, partly derived from one side of Descartes' ambiguous legacy. The fourth was the mid-19th century "scientific" material­ ism, which flourished mainly in Germany and England, and was tied to the upsurge of chemistry and biology. The fifth was dialec­ tical and historical materialism, which accompanied the consolida­ tion of the socialist ideology. And the sixth or current stage, evolved mainly by Australian and American philosophers, is aca­ demic and nonpartisan but otherwise very heterogeneous. Ancient materialism was thoroughly mechanistic.
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Dordrecht : Springer
    ISBN: 9789400983922
    Language: English
    Pages: Online-Ressource (252p) , digital
    Edition: Springer eBook Collection. Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
    Series Statement: Philosophy and Medicine 8
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Keywords: Philosophy (General) ; medicine Philosophy ; Medical ethics ; Medicine—Philosophy. ; Bioethics.
    Abstract: Section I / Historical and Conceptual Background -- Justice: A Philosophical Review -- Justice and Rights: A Study in Relationship -- Justice and Health Care: A Theological Review -- Justice and Health Care: Historical Perspectives and Precedents -- Section II / Issues of Micro-Allocation -- Do Justice, Love Mercy: The Inappropriateness of the Concept of Justice Applied to Bedside Decisions -- Justice and Prenatal Life -- Justice and the Defective Newborn -- Justice and the Dying -- Section III / Issues Of Macro-Allocation -- Health Care Allocations: Responses to the Unjust, the Unfortunate, and the Undesirable -- Priorities in the Allocation of Health Care Resources -- Health Care for the Haves and Have-nots: Toward a Just Basis of Distribution -- Cost Containment and Justice -- Justice and Human Research -- Justice and the Claims of Future Generations -- Justice: A Moral Test for Health Care and Health Policy -- Notes on Contributors.
    Abstract: Bioethics is a discipline still not fully explored in spite of its rather remark­ able expansion and sophistication during the past two decades. The prolifer­ ation of courses in bioethics at educational institutions of every description gives testimony to an intense academic interest in its concerns. The media have catapulted the dilemmas of bioethics out of the laboratory and library into public view arid discussion with a steady report of the so-called 'mira­ cles of modern medicine' and the moral perplexities which frequently accom­ pany them. The published work of philosophers, theologians, lawyers and others represents a substantial and growing body of literature which explores relevant concepts and issues. Commitments have been made by existing in­ stitutions, and new institutions have been chartered to further the discussion of the strategic moral concerns that attend recent scientific and medical progress. This volume focuses attention on one of the numerous topics of interest within bioethics. Specifically, an examination is made of the implications of the principle of justice for health care. Apart from four essays in Ethics and Health Policy edited by Robert Veatch and Roy Branson [4] the dis­ cussion of justice and health care has been occasional, almost non-existent, and scattered. The paucity of literature in this area is regrettable but perhaps understandable. On the one hand, Joseph Fletcher, one of the contemporary pioneers in bioethics, can hold that "distributive justice is the core or key question for biomedical ethics" ([1], p. 102).
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...