Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • München BSB  (3)
  • Horne, Will  (2)
  • Bello, David Anthony  (1)
  • Cambridge : Cambridge University Press  (3)
  • Stanford, Calif. : Stanford Univ. Press
  • Politik  (3)
  • Zeitschrift
Datasource
Material
Language
Years
Author, Corporation
Publisher
  • Cambridge : Cambridge University Press  (3)
  • Stanford, Calif. : Stanford Univ. Press
Keywords
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American affective polarization in comparative perspective (2020)
    Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
    Details
    ISBN: 9781108914123
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (85 Seiten)
    Series Statement: Cambridge elements: Elements in American politics
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    DDC: 306.0973
    RVK:
    MG 70329
    Keywords: Geschichte 1990-2020 ; Polarization (Social sciences) / United States ; Polarization (Social sciences) / Cross-cultural studies ; Right and left (Political science) / United States ; Political parties / United States ; Spaltung ; Politik ; Gesellschaft ; Polarisierung ; United States / Politics and government / 1989- ; USA ; USA ; Politik ; Polarisierung ; Gesellschaft ; Spaltung ; Geschichte 1990-2020
    Abstract: American political observers express increasing concern about affective polarization, i.e., partisans' resentment toward political opponents. We advance debates about America's partisan divisions by comparing affective polarization in the US over the past 25 years with affective polarization in 19 other western publics. We conclude that American affective polarization is not extreme in comparative perspective, although Americans' dislike of partisan opponents has increased more rapidly since the mid-1990s than in most other Western publics. We then show that affective polarization is more intense when unemployment and inequality are high; when political elites clash over cultural issues such as immigration and national identity; and in countries with majoritarian electoral institutions. Our findings situate American partisan resentment and hostility in comparative perspective, and illuminate correlates of affective polarization that are difficult to detect when examining the American case in isolation
    DOI: 10.1017/9781108914123
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    URL: lizenzpflichtig
    URL: lizenzpflichtig
    URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914123
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    München BSB
    BSZ
    GBV
    KOBV
    HeBIS
    BVB
  • 2
    Book
    Book
    American affective polarization in comparative perspective (2020)
    Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
    Details
    ISBN: 9781108823449
    Language: English
    Pages: 85 Seiten , Diagramme
    Series Statement: Cambridge elements: Elements in American politics
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    DDC: 306.0973
    RVK:
    MG 70329
    Keywords: Geschichte 1990-2020 ; Polarization (Social sciences) / United States ; Polarization (Social sciences) / Cross-cultural studies ; Right and left (Political science) / United States ; Political parties / United States ; Spaltung ; Politik ; Gesellschaft ; Polarisierung ; United States / Politics and government / 1989- ; USA ; USA ; Politik ; Polarisierung ; Gesellschaft ; Spaltung ; Geschichte 1990-2020
    Abstract: American political observers express increasing concern about affective polarization, i.e., partisans' resentment toward political opponents. We advance debates about America's partisan divisions by comparing affective polarization in the US over the past 25 years with affective polarization in 19 other western publics. We conclude that American affective polarization is not extreme in comparative perspective, although Americans' dislike of partisan opponents has increased more rapidly since the mid-1990s than in most other Western publics. We then show that affective polarization is more intense when unemployment and inequality are high; when political elites clash over cultural issues such as immigration and national identity; and in countries with majoritarian electoral institutions. Our findings situate American partisan resentment and hostility in comparative perspective, and illuminate correlates of affective polarization that are difficult to detect when examining the American case in isolation
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Book
    München BSB
    BSZ
    GBV
    BVB
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Across forest, steppe and mountain : environment, identity, and empire in Qing China's borderlands (2015)
    Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
    Details
    ISBN: 9781107706095
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 online resource (xviii, 336 pages)
    Series Statement: Studies in environment and history
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    DDC: 304.20951
    RVK:
    NO 8500
    RVK:
    NP 6650
    RVK:
    RR 69915
    Keywords: Geschichte ; Indigenes Volk ; Politik ; Umwelt ; Umweltpolitik ; Environmental policy / China / History ; Borderlands / Environmental aspects / China / History ; Hunting and gathering societies / China / Manchuria / History ; Pastoral systems / China / Inner Mongolia / History ; Indigenous peoples / China / Yunnan Sheng / History ; Sustainability / Political aspects / China / History ; Human ecology / Political aspects / China / History ; Imperialism / Environmental aspects / China / History ; Ethnicity / Environmental aspects / China / History ; China / History / Qing dynasty, 1644-1912
    Abstract: In this book, David Bello offers a new and radical interpretation of how China's last dynasty, the Qing (1644–1911), relied on the interrelationship between ecology and ethnicity to incorporate the country's far-flung borderlands into the dynasty's expanding empire. The dynasty tried to manage the sustainable survival and compatibility of discrete borderland ethnic regimes in Manchuria, Inner Mongolia, and Yunnan within a corporatist 'Han Chinese' imperial political order. This unprecedented imperial unification resulted in the great human and ecological diversity that exists today. Using natural science literature in conjunction with under-utilized and new sources in the Manchu language, Bello demonstrates how Qing expansion and consolidation of empire was dependent on a precise and intense manipulation of regional environmental relationships
    Description / Table of Contents: Qing Fields in Theory & Practice -- The Nature of Imperial Foraging in the SAH Basin -- The Nature of Imperial Pastoralism in Southern Inner Mongolia -- The Nature of Imperial Indigenism in Southwestern Yunnan -- Borderland Hanspace in the Nineteenth Century -- Qing Environmentality
    Note: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Feb 2016)
    DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107706095
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107706095
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    München BSB
    BSZ
    GBV
    KOBV
    HeBIS
    BVB
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...