Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • MPI Ethno. Forsch.  (1)
  • HU-Berlin Edoc
  • MFK München
  • 2020-2024  (1)
  • Kuromiya, Hiroaki  (1)
  • Stuttgart : ibidem Verlag  (1)
  • Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
  • Hochschulschrift  (1)
  • Political Science  (1)
  • German Studies
Datasource
  • MPI Ethno. Forsch.  (1)
  • HU-Berlin Edoc
  • MFK München
Material
Language
Years
  • 2020-2024  (1)
Year
Publisher
  • Stuttgart : ibidem Verlag  (1)
  • Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
Keywords
Subjects(RVK)
  • Political Science  (1)
  • German Studies
  • 1
    ISBN: 9783838218038 , 3838218035
    Language: English
    Pages: 315 Seiten , Diagramme , 21 cm x 14.8 cm, 433 g
    Series Statement: Soviet and post-Soviet politics and society vol. 270
    Series Statement: Soviet and post-Soviet politics and society
    Dissertation note: Dissertation University College London 2022
    DDC: 947.7086
    RVK:
    Keywords: Hochschulschrift ; Russisch-Ukrainischer Krieg ; Donezbecken ; Kriegsursache ; Geschichte 2014 ; Russisch-Ukrainischer Krieg ; Donezbecken ; Kriegsursache ; Geschichte 2014
    Abstract: The war in Ukraine did not start on 24 February 2022. It began eight years earlier in eastern Ukraine's Donbas region. In his new book, Jakob Hauter investigates the escalation of violence in the spring and summer of 2014. He demonstrates that, contrary to popular belief, the pre-2022 conflict was not a civil war. Ukraine has been fighting a Russian invasion since the armed conflict’s very beginning. Hauter arrives at this conclusion based on a thorough review of the digital open source information (DOSI) available on the Internet. He argues that social science research needs theoretical and methodological innovation to operate in the abundant but murky information environment surrounding the Donbas War and other conflicts of the social media age. To address this challenge, he develops an escalation sequence model which divides the formative phase of the Donbas War into six critical junctures. He then combines the social science methodology of process tracing with DOSI analysis to investigate the causes of these critical junctures. For each juncture, Hauter assesses the available evidence of domestic causes and Russian interference, reaching the conclusion that, in most cases, there is convincing evidence that Russian involvement was the primary cause of armed escalation.
    Note: Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 267-315 , The war's critical junctures , Digital forensic process tracing , Of arms and barricades: Donetsk and Luhansk in early April , Enter Igor Girkin : the occupation of Sloviansk and Kramatorsk , Mariupol : where separatism failed , The fighting spreads , The calibers grow , The tide turns : the Ukrainian defeat of August 2014
    URL: Inhaltstext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    URL: Unbekannt  (lizenzpflichtig)
    URL: Inhaltsverzeichnis  (lizenzpflichtig)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...