Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T14:15:15.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polygamy and Legislation in Contemporary Iran: An Analysis of the Public Legal Discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Irene Schneider
Irene Schneider*
Affiliation:
Seminar für Arabistik/Islamwissenschaft, Universität Göttingen, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the interaction between different interpretations of Islamic jurisprudence in Iran and state law. It focuses on the public legal discourse about the new Family Draft Law in 2007–08, especially Article 23 regulating polygamous marriages and removing necessity for the first wife’s permission. The participants in this public legal debate, which took place on the internet and in the media, were civil society organizations, especially women’s organizations, the Shiite clergy, and state representatives. The article argues that even in a non-democratic, theocratic state such as the Islamic Republic of Iran, public discourse promoted by the named actors can challenge and influence state legislation. The removal of Article 23 from the Draft confirms this argument, but in the law of 2013 the requirement for the first wife’s permission is not found. By looking at the arguments brought forward in the public discourse, the article demonstrates that the arguments are mainly “Islamic,” and none refers to international human rights, as this seems to be a kind of taboo in the political discourse.

Keywords

Islamic LawWomen’s RightsCivil Society
Type
Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , July 2016 , pp. 657 - 676
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Iranian Studies 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmadī Khorāsānī, Nūshīn. Jonbesh-e yek milyūn emzā. Tehran: Moʾallef, 1386/2008.Google Scholar
Afary, Janet. Sexual Politics in Modern Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, Holger. “Zivilgesellschaft und der vordere Orient: Das Prinzip Hoffnung und die Grenzen eines sozialwissenschaftlichen Konzepts.” In Neues Jahrbuch Dritte Welt: Zivilgesellschaft, edited by Betz, Joachim and Hein, Wolfgang. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2005: 118–143.Google Scholar
Amani, Elahe. “From Bad to Worse and Beyond …” Accessed March 7, 2015. http://www.iran-women-solidarity.net/spip.php?article430Google Scholar
Arjomand, Said Amir. “Authority in Shiism and Constitutional Developments in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” In The Twelver Shia in Modern Times, edited by Brunner, Rainer and Ende, Werner. Leiden: Brill, 2001: 301–332.Google Scholar
Arjomand, Said Amir. “Constitution of the Islamic Republic.” Encylopedia Iranica. Online edition. Accessed December 29, 2014. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/constitution-of-the-islamic-republicGoogle Scholar
Buskens, Leon. “Recent Debates on Family Law Reform in Morocco: Islamic Law as Politics in an Emerging Public Sphere.” Islamic Law and Society 10 (2003): 70–131. doi: 10.1163/15685190360560924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebadi, Shirin, and Aasen, Henriette Sinding. “Rights of Women and Children in Iran.” In Democracy, Human Rights and Islam in Modern Iran; Psychological, Social, and Cultural Perspectives, edited by Kim, Uichol, Aasen, Henriette Sinding, and Ebadi, Shirin. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2003.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1972.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Der Wille zum Wissen, Sexualität und Wahrheit 1. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1983.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. “Discourse, Power and the Subject.” In Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, edited by Hall, Stuart. London: Sage, 1997: 41–53.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart, and Gieben, Bram, eds. Formations of Modernity. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar
Kūlāʾī, Elāheh. Chālesh-hā-ye farāyand-e tazmīn-e hoqūq-e zanān dar keshvar-hā-ye eslāmī va cheshmandāz-e ejrāʾī-ye paymānnāmeh-ye Sīdā dar Īrān. Tehran: UNICEF Office, 2007.Google Scholar
Layish, Aharon. “The Transformation of the Sharīʿa from Jurists’ Law to Statutory Law in the Contemporary Muslim World.” Die Welt des Islams 44 (2004): 85–113. doi: 10.1163/157006004773712587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubenow, Jorge Adriano. “Public Sphere and Deliberative Democracy in Jürgen Habermas: Theoretical Model and Critical Discourses.” American Journal of Sociological Research 2, no. 4 (2012): 58–71.Google Scholar
Mansūr, Jahāngīr. “Qānūn-e hemāyat-e khānevādeh.” In Qavānīn va moqarrarāt-e marbūt beh ezdevāj va talāq by Jahāngīr Mansūr. 17th ed. Tehran: Intishārāt-e Dawrān, 1377/1998Google Scholar
Mawlāverdī, Shahīndokht. “Goftemān-e maslahatgerā va Konvensiyūn-e rafʿ-e kolliyeh-ye ashkāl-e tabʿīz ʿalayh-e zanān.” Rayhāneh 6 (2004): 203–217.Google Scholar
Mawlāverdī, Shahīndokht. “Lāyeheh-ye ʿalayh-e khānevadeh.” Kārgozarān (2008).Google Scholar
Mawlāverdī, Shahīndokht. “Zanān: yek gām beh pīsh, rāh na-tamām.” Shahrāvand-e emrūz 31 (Shahrīvar/September 2008): 81.Google Scholar
Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. Marriage on Trial. A Study of Islamic Law. Rev. ed. London: Tauris, 2000.Google Scholar
Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. “Muslim Women’s Quest for Equality: Between Islamic Law and Feminism.” In Islamic Political Thought and Governance, edited by Saeed, Abdullah. London: Routledge, 2011: 629–645.Google Scholar
Opwis, Felicitas. “Islamic Law and Legal Change: The Concept of Maslaha in Classical and Contemporary Islamic Legal Theory.” In Shari’a. Islamic Law in the Contemporary Context, edited by Amanat, Abbas and Griffel, Frank. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007: 62–82.Google Scholar
Osanloo, Arzoo. The Politics of Women’s Rights in Iran. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osanloo, Arzoo. “What a Focus on ‘Family’ means in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” In Family Law in Islam: Divorce, Marriage and Women in the Muslim World, edited by Voorhoeve, Maaike. London: Tauris, 2012: 51–76.Google Scholar
Paidar, Parvin. Women and the Political Process in Twentieth-Century Iran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Schneider, Irene. “Registration, Court System, and Procedure in Afghan Family Law.” Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law 12 (2005/2006): 209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Irene. “Islamisches Recht zwischen göttlicher Satzung und temporaler Ordnung? Überlegungen zum Grenzbereich zwischen Recht und Religion.” In Recht und Religion, edited by Langenfeld, Christine and Schneider, Irene. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag, 2008: 138–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Irene. “Civil Society and Legislation, Development of the Human Rights Situation.” In Beiträge zum Islamischen Recht VII. Islam und Menschenrechte, edited by Elliesie, Hatem. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang, 2010: 387–414.Google Scholar
Vasmaqī, Sedīqeh. Zan, feqh, Eslām. Tehran: Samadiyyeh, 2008. (In English: Vasmaghi, Sedigheh. Women, Jurisprudence, Islam.) Translated by Mr Ashna and Philip Kreyenbroek. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2014.Google Scholar
Yassari, Najma, and Möller, Lena-Maria. “Recht im Iran ab 1925.” In Handbuch Iranistik, edited by Paul, Ludwig. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2013: 144–154.Google Scholar