813221145     

423669664                        

---

Radical interactionism on the rise / edited by Lonnie H. Athens

Athens, Lonnie H., 1949-

Bingley, U.K : Emerald, 2013

Online Ressource (xi, 246 p.) : ill.

Englisch

Radical interactionism / Norman K. Denzin"Radical" and "symbolic" interactionism : demarcating their borders / Lonnie H. Athens -- Mead's conception of the social act : a radical interactionist's critique / Lonnie H. Athens -- Toward a radical interactionist account of science / Antony J. Puddephatt -- Domination and resistance : the political theory of John Dewey / Gil Richard Musolf -- Revisiting learning to labor / Matthew Gougherty, Tim Hallett -- Dominance, deference, and demeanor in mad men / Michael A. Katovich -- Reflections on power and intersectionality / Caroline Joan S. Picart -- The best road for pragmatism : neo-pragmatism or radical interactionism? / James A. Shaw.

Includes index

Erscheint auch als: (Druck-Ausgabe)

978-1-78190-785-6 ( : electronic bk.); 1-78190-785-4 (electronic bk.)

978-1-78190-784-9 (ISBN der Printausgabe)

OCoLC: 866642993     

OCoLC: 866642993 (aus SWB)     

Online-Ausg.

Elektronische Ressource: Zugang beim Produzenten (Lizenzangabe: Lizenzpflichtig)

HM1111

302     Ähnliche Literatur

bisacsh: PSY031000 ; bicssc: JFFP ; bicssc: JF ; bisacsh: SOC026000 ; bisacsh: SOC000000 ; bisacsh: PSY 031000 ; UDC: 308

LOC-SH: Symbolic interactionism ; Social interaction ; Social interaction ; Symbolic interactionism

Electronic books ; Social Science ; Sociology ; General ; Social Science ; General ; Social interaction ; Society & culture: general ; PSYCHOLOGY ; Social Psychology ; Social interaction ; Symbolic interactionism

This issue focuses on "radical interactionism". which recent emergence as an alternative perspective to conventional symbolic interactionism has sparked fierce debate in both North America and Europe. Lonnie Athens discusses the four fundamental differences between radical and conventional symbolic interactionism. The prominent scholars compare the relative insights offered not only between radical interactionism and symbolic interactionism, but between radical interactionism and feminism, dramaturgy, critical studies, and neo-pragmatism. Without exception, they found the radical interactionism revealed new and formidable insights that improved our general understanding of human group life and critical problems that arise during it. While some contributors believe that radical interactionism marks the development of a new and more vibrant form of interactionism which in due time will replace its much older and more conservative cousin, others believe that it only signals the need for traditional interactionists to finally start making some much-needed modifications in symbolic interactionism if they wish it to remain a viable sociological perspective in the 21st century