Inhalt: | One: Soviet Foreign Policy under Gorbachev -- Comments on the paper of Arnold L. Horelick (1) -- Comments on the paper of Arnold L. Horelick (2) -- Comments on the paper of Arnold L. Horelick (3) -- Summary of discussion -- Two: Domestic Policy under Gorbachev -- Comments on the paper of Michel Tatu (1) -- Comments on the paper of Michel Tatu (2) -- Comments on the paper of Michel Tatu (3) -- Summary of discussion -- Three: Arms Control under Gorbachev -- Comments on the paper of Lawrence Freedman (1) -- Comments on the paper of Lawrence Freedman (2) -- Comments on the paper of Lawrence Freedman (3) -- Summary of discussion -- Four: Security Aspects of Science and Technology in the Ussr -- Comments on the paper of Heinrich Vogel and Hans-Henning Schröder (1) -- Comments on the paper of Heinrich Vogel and Hans-Henning Schröder (2) -- Comments on the paper of Heinrich Vogel and Hans-Henning Schröder (3) -- Summary of discussion -- Five: Economics — Overall -- Comments on the paper of Pierre Audigier (1) -- Comments on the paper of Pierre Audigier (2) -- Comments on the paper of Pierre Audigier (3) -- Summary of discussion -- Six: Economics — Military-Industrial -- Comments on the paper of Herbert S. Levine and Bryan Roberts (1) -- Comments on the paper of Herbert S. Levine and Bryan Roberts (2) -- Comments on the paper of Herbert S. Levine and Bryan Roberts (3) -- Summary of discussion -- Seven: Current Soviet Military Doctrine -- Comments on the paper of Franklyn Griffiths (1) -- Comments on the paper of Franklyn Griffiths (2) -- Comments on the paper of Franklyn Griffiths (3) -- Summary of discussion -- Eight: Soviet Military Strategy in the Emerging Post-Nuclear Era -- Comments on the paper of Edward Luttwak (1) -- Comments on the paper of Edward Luttwak (2) -- Comments on the paper of Edward Luttwak (3) -- Summary of discussion. LORD CARRINGTON Secretary General, North Atla/ltic Treaty Orga/lisation In providing a foreword to this volume, I have to declare an interest. I was, and am still, an enthusiastic advocate of the idea of having a resident Sovietologist at NATO headquarters, Indeed, I wondered how the work of the organisation had been done for so long without the benefit of a resident expert on a subject of such crucial interest. I was therefore delighted when an American academic of high reputation, Murray Feshbach, joined us as our first Sovietologist. I was also encouraged that he decided to organise last November a Workshop in which NATO staff could take part and which would attract prestigious participants from all the countries of this alliance, I saw for myself the high level of interest created by the Workshop, and judge it to have a very considerable success, I hope there will be other similar events in the future, There is no doubt that, in the light of the series of developments and changes launched over recent months by Mr. |
