Titel: | |
VerfasserIn: | |
Sonst. Personen: | |
Sprache/n: | Englisch |
Veröffentlichungsangabe: | Dordrecht : Springer, 1999 |
Umfang: | Online-Ressource (276p) : digital |
Schriftenreihe: | |
Bibliogr. Zusammenhang: | |
ISBN: | 978-94-011-4289-2 |
Identifier: | |
Schlagwörter: | |
Mehr zum Thema: | Klassifikation der Library of Congress: P101-410Dewey Dezimal-Klassifikation: 410; ; 410.1; Book Industry Communication: CF |
Inhalt: | Most linguistic theories assume that each grammatical relation is established in a unique structural configuration. Neeleman and Weerman take issue with this view, arguing for a more flexible approach on the basis of conceptual considerations and data taken mostly, but not exclusively, from the Germanic languages. In-depth analyses of word order phenomena as well as diachronic and typological generalizations motivate a re-evaluation of the role of case in the projection of arguments. Case is shown to provide a syntactic foothold for thematic interpretation, something which is necessary in a grammar that does not allow fixed theta-positions. Thus, this study does not only offer a genuine alternative to many standard assumptions, it also explains why there should be such a thing as case in natural language |
Gesamttitel: | |
Mehr zum Titel: | |
| |
Anmerkung: | Vervielfältigungen (z.B. Kopien, Downloads) sind nur von einzelnen Kapiteln oder Seiten und nur zum eigenen wissenschaftlichen Gebrauch erlaubt. Keine Weitergabe an Dritte. Kein systematisches Downloaden durch Robots. |
Volltext: | |
| |
|
|
| |