Deutsch Englisch

Home

Neuerwerbungen

Speichern

Abmelden

Trefferanalyse

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 von 1
      
* Ihre Aktion  suchen [und] ([ALL] Alle Wörter) 1022166336
Online Ressourcen (ohne Zeitschr.)
Titel: 
Person/en: 
Sprache/n: 
Englisch
Veröffentlichungsangabe: 
Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group, Poverty and Equity Global Practice, March 2018
Umfang: 
1 Online-Ressource (circa 50 Seiten) : Illustrationen
Schriftenreihe: 
Bibliogr. Zusammenhang: 
Erscheint auch als: Druck-Ausgabe- Belghith, Nadia Belhaj Hassine: Analysis of the Mismatch between Tanzania Household Budget Survey and National Panel Survey Data in Poverty and Inequality Levels and Trends. - Washington, D.C : The World Bank, 2018
Identifier: 
Schlagwörter: 
Inhalt: 
This study carries out a thorough investigation of the potential sources of mismatch in poverty and inequality levels and trends between the Tanzania National Panel Survey and Household Budget Survey. The main findings of the study include the following. First, the difference in poverty levels between the Household Budget Survey and the National Panel Survey is essentially explained by the differences in the methods of estimating the poverty line. Second, the discrepancy in poverty trends can be mainly attributed to the difference in inter-year temporal price deflators, and, to a lesser extent, spatial price deflators. The use of the consumer price index for adjusting consumption variation across years would show a decline in poverty during the past five years for the Household Budget Survey and the National Panel Survey. Third, despite noticeable differences in the methods of household consumption data collection, the Household Budget Survey and National Panel Survey show close mean household consumption levels in the last rounds, when using the consumer price index to adjust for inter-year price variations. Mean household consumption levels in the Household Budget Survey 2011/12 and National Panel Survey 2010/11 are comparable, and the mean consumption level in the National Panel Survey 2012/13 is around 10 percent higher. The difference is driven by higher levels of aggregate and food consumption by the better-off groups in the National Panel Survey. Fourth, the mismatch in inequality trends and pro-poor growth patterns between the two surveys could not be resolved and is a subject for further analysis
Nationallizenzen
 
Anmerkung: 
Vervielfältigungen (z.B. Kopien, Downloads) sind nur von einzelnen Kapiteln oder Seiten und nur zum eigenen wissenschaftlichen Gebrauch erlaubt. Die Weitergabe an Dritte sowie systematisches Downloaden sind untersagt.
Volltext: 
 
 
 
1 von 1
      
Über den Zitierlink können Sie diesen Titel als Lesezeichen ablegen oder weiterleiten
zugehörige Publikationen  
1 von 1