Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (20 Seiten)
    Publ. der Quelle: Basel : MDPI
    Angaben zur Quelle: 14,2
    DDC: 301
    Keywords: Islam ; radicalization ; deradicalization ; narrative ; narrative persuasion ; narrative genre ; discourse historical approach ; in/exclusion ; Soziologie und Anthropologie
    Abstract: Radical/extremist Islamist actors use social media to disseminate uncompromising stories of monist religious political orders and identities. As a reaction, counter-movements to online Islamist radicalism/extremism emerged in Western societies (and beyond), while uncertainty about effective outcomes remains widespread. In a bid to understand how inclusionary and exclusionary discursive spaces are created, we ask: How do some Muslim actors create discursive spaces open to self-reflection, pluralism and liberal-democratic principles, while others construct illiberal, particularistic and non/anti-democratic spaces? To respond to this question, we compare two contrasting storytellers, one who agitates for exclusionary Islamist radicalism/extremism (Generation Islam) and one who offers inclusionary prevention and deradicalization work against that (Jamal al-Khatib). We draw on novel narrative approaches to the Discourse Historical Approach (DHA) in Critical Discourse Studies (CDS), via which we compare text-level and context-level narratives disseminated about three Muslim-related crises: the racist terrorist attacks/genocide to represent the national, European and global level. Our two-layered, DHA-inspired narrative analysis illustrates that, at the level of text, narrative persuasion varies between both contrasting actors. While Jamal al-Khatib disseminates persuasive stories, Generation Islam is much less invested in narrative persuasion; it seems to address an already convinced audience. These two text-level strategies reveal their meaning in two antagonistic narrative genres: Jamal al-Khatib’s “self-reflexive savior” creates an inclusionary discursive space represented in a self-ironic narrative genre, while Generation Islam’s ”crusading savior” manufactures an exclusionary discursive space represented in a romance featuring a nostalgic return to the particularistic Islamic umma.
    Abstract: Peer Reviewed
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISBN: 9783658470333
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (xix, 255 Seiten) , Diagramme
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Dissertation note: Dissertation Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder) 2024
    DDC: 302.231
    RVK:
    Keywords: Social Media ; Social media ; Hochschulschrift
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiesbaden : Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden | Wiesbaden : Imprint: Springer VS
    ISBN: 9783658470333
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource(XIX, 255 p. 18 illus.)
    Edition: 1st ed. 2025.
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    DDC: 302.231
    Keywords: Social media.
    Abstract: Introduction -- The message: do no harm -- The receiver: resisting the message -- The sender: using narrative persuasion -- The channel: disseminating narratives on social media platforms -- Case design and case selection -- Methodology -- Results and discussion -- Key findings and Summary.
    Abstract: This book proposes a novel approach to human rights work, advocating the use of narrative persuasion on social media to realign individual moral judgments with fundamental human rights. It challenges the traditional view that human rights are primarily political/legal rights, proposing instead that they should be understood as moral rights, identifying the right not to be harmed as universal, fundamental moral right. By integrating insights from philosophy, social psychology, neuroscience, and communication studies, Linda Walter explores how human rights work can be more effectively carried out on social media. The author uses a case study of the social media campaign "Jamal al-Khatib" to examine the impact of narrative persuasion on changing harmful attitudes. Through qualitative content analysis, she assesses how resistance strategies manifest in the audience's comments and explores the effectiveness of narrative persuasion in overcoming these barriers. The findings reveal the complexities of altering deeply held beliefs but also highlight the potential of narrative persuasion to engage and shift individual attitudes toward human rights. About the author Linda Walter holds a doctorate from the Faculty of Social and Cultural Sciences at the European University Viadrina. She is the managing director and co-founder of Future Challenges e.V. and an independent consultant. Her research focuses on human rights, social media and narrative persuasion.
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...