Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISBN: 9781108914123
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 online resource (94 pages)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    DDC: 306.0973
    RVK:
    Abstract: American political observers express increasing concern about affective polarization, i.e., partisans' resentment toward political opponents. We advance debates about America's partisan divisions by comparing affective polarization in the US over the past 25 years with affective polarization in 19 other western publics.
    Abstract: Cover -- Title page -- Copyright page -- American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective -- Contents -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Theoretical Debates in the Study of Affective Polarization -- 1.2 Plan of the Element, and our Key Findings -- 1.2.1 Situating America's Afective Polarization in Comparative Perspective -- 1.2.2 Explaining Variations in Affective Polarization -- 1.3 A Note on Inference -- 2 Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective: How Does the American Public Compare? -- 2.1 Defining and Measuring Affective PolarizationUsing Election Survey Data -- 2.1.1 Survey Questions and Variable Construction -- 2.1.2 Computing the Level of Affective Polarization for a Country-YearElection Survey -- 2.1.3 Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems -- 2.1.4 Technical Details of the Formulas for Computing AffectivePolarization Scores -- 2.1.5 Case Selection and Descriptive Statistics -- 2.2 Cross-National Levels of Affective Polarization: TheUn-exceptional United States -- 2.3 Cross-National Comparisons of Out-Party Dislikeand In-Party Liking -- 2.4 Cross-National Trends in Affective Polarization -- 2.5 Cross-National Trends in Out-Party Dislikeand In-Party Liking -- 2.6 Conclusions: Do Not Exaggerate American AffectivePolarization, Do Be Concerned about Its Rise -- 3 Explaining Variations in Affective Polarization in the United States and Abroad -- 3.1 Explaining Variations in Affective Polarization -- 3.1.1 The Role of Elite Ideological and Policy Disagreements -- 3.1.2 National Economic Conditions: Inequality and Unemployment -- 3.1.3 Electoral Institutions -- 3.2 Data and Measurement -- 3.3 The Relationship between Affective Polarization and OurExplanatory Variables: Empirical Analyses -- 3.3.1 Multivariate Analyses -- 3.4 Discussion: Situating American Affective Polarizationin Comparative Perspective.
    Note: Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISBN: 9781108823449
    Language: English
    Pages: 85 Seiten , Diagramme
    Series Statement: Cambridge elements: Elements in American politics
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als
    DDC: 306.0973
    RVK:
    Keywords: Geschichte 1990-2020 ; Polarization (Social sciences) / United States ; Polarization (Social sciences) / Cross-cultural studies ; Right and left (Political science) / United States ; Political parties / United States ; Spaltung ; Politik ; Gesellschaft ; Polarisierung ; United States / Politics and government / 1989- ; USA ; USA ; Politik ; Polarisierung ; Gesellschaft ; Spaltung ; Geschichte 1990-2020
    Abstract: American political observers express increasing concern about affective polarization, i.e., partisans' resentment toward political opponents. We advance debates about America's partisan divisions by comparing affective polarization in the US over the past 25 years with affective polarization in 19 other western publics. We conclude that American affective polarization is not extreme in comparative perspective, although Americans' dislike of partisan opponents has increased more rapidly since the mid-1990s than in most other Western publics. We then show that affective polarization is more intense when unemployment and inequality are high; when political elites clash over cultural issues such as immigration and national identity; and in countries with majoritarian electoral institutions. Our findings situate American partisan resentment and hostility in comparative perspective, and illuminate correlates of affective polarization that are difficult to detect when examining the American case in isolation
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,
    ISBN: 1-108-90684-2 , 1-108-91224-9 , 1-108-91412-8
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 online resource (85 pages) : , digital, PDF file(s).
    Series Statement: Cambridge elements. Elements in American politics,
    Series Statement: Cambridge elements. Elements in American politics,
    DDC: 306.0973
    Keywords: Polarization (Social sciences) ; Polarization (Social sciences) Cross-cultural studies. ; Right and left (Political science) ; Political parties ; United States Politics and government 1989-.
    Abstract: American political observers express increasing concern about affective polarization, i.e., partisans' resentment toward political opponents. We advance debates about America's partisan divisions by comparing affective polarization in the US over the past 25 years with affective polarization in 19 other western publics. We conclude that American affective polarization is not extreme in comparative perspective, although Americans' dislike of partisan opponents has increased more rapidly since the mid-1990s than in most other Western publics. We then show that affective polarization is more intense when unemployment and inequality are high; when political elites clash over cultural issues such as immigration and national identity; and in countries with majoritarian electoral institutions. Our findings situate American partisan resentment and hostility in comparative perspective, and illuminate correlates of affective polarization that are difficult to detect when examining the American case in isolation.
    Note: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 29 Oct 2020).
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...