Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISBN: 9783319424057
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (xiii, 284 Seiten)
    Series Statement: Studies in the history of law and justice volume 6
    Series Statement: SpringerLink
    Series Statement: Bücher
    Series Statement: Springer eBook Collection
    Series Statement: Law and Criminology
    Series Statement: Studies in the history of law and justice
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als Reconsidering Constitutional Formation (Veranstaltung : 2015 : Macerata) Reconsidering constitutional formation I national sovereignty
    Parallel Title: Erscheint auch als Reconsidering Constitutional Formation (Veranstaltung : 2015 : Macerata) Reconsidering constitutional formation I national sovereignty
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Law ; Constitutional law ; Law-History ; Law—Philosophy. ; Konferenzschrift ; Europa ; Konstitutionalismus ; Souveränität ; Geschichte 1788-1861
    Abstract: Juridification by Constitution. National Sovereignty in the 18th and 19th c. Europe; Ulrike Müßig -- National sovereignty in the Belgian Constitution of 1831. On the meaning(s) of article 25; Brecht Deseure -- The Omnipotence of Parliament in the legitimisation process of ‘representative government’ during the Albertine Statute (1848-1861); Giuseppe Mecca -- Sovereignty Issue in the Public Discussion in the Era of the Polish 3rd of May Constitution; Anna Tarnowska -- Appendix: English translation of the Statute ‘Our free Royal Cities in the States of Rzeczpospolita’ of April 18, 1791 by Ulrike Müßig and Max Bärnreuther, together with Inge Bily -- About the Authors -- Index
    Abstract: Legal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics.Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts through a functional approach to the interdependencies between constitution and public discourse. Sovereignty had to be ‘believed’ by the subjects and the political élites. Such a communicative orientation of constitutional processesbecame palpable in the ‘religious’ affinities of the constitutional preambles. They were held as ‘creeds’ of a new order, not only due to their occasional recourse to divine authority, but rather due to the claim for eternal validity contexts of constitutional guarantees. The communication dependency of constitutions was of less concern in terms of the preamble than the constituents’ big worries about government organisation. Their indecisiveness between monarchical and popular sovereignty was established through the discrediting of the Republic in the Jacobean reign of terror and the ‘renaissance’ of the monarchy in the military resistance against the French revolutionary and later Napoleonic campaigns. The constitutional formation as a legal act of constituting could therefore defend the monarchy from the threat of the people (Albertine Statute 1848), could be a legal decision of a national constituent assembly (Belgian Constitution 1831), could borrow from the old liberties (Polish May Constitution 1791) or try to remain in between by referring to the Nation as sovereign (French September Constitution 1791, Cádiz Constitution 1812). Common to all contexts is the use of national sovereignty as a legal starting point. The consequent differentiation between constituent and constituted power manages to justify the self-commitment of political power in legal terms. National sovereignty is the synonym for the juridification of sovereignty by means of the constitution. The novelty of the constitutions of the late 18th and 19th century is the normativity, the positivity of the constitutional law as one unified law, to be the measure for the legality of all other law. Therefore ReConFort will continue with the precedence of constitution. (www.reconfort.eu)
    Note: "This volume reports on the first research results of the ERC Adanced Grant ReConFort, Reconsidering Constitutional Formation ... spring conference of the University of Macerata from the 9 to 11 March 2015"
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    URL: Cover
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISBN: 9783319424057
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (284 p.)
    Series Statement: Studies in the History of Law and Justice
    Keywords: Law
    Abstract: This open access book can be downloaded from link.springer.comLegal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics. Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts through a functional approach to the interdependencies between constitution and public discourse. Sovereignty had to be ‘believed’ by the subjects and the political élites. Such a communicative orientation of constitutional processes became palpable in the ‘religious’ affinities of the constitutional preambles. They were held as ‘creeds’ of a new order, not only due to their occasional recourse to divine authority, but rather due to the claim for eternal validity contexts of constitutional guarantees. The communication dependency of constitutions was of less concern in terms of the preamble than the constituents’ big worries about government organisation. Their indecisiveness between monarchical and popular sovereignty was established through the discrediting of the Republic in the Jacobean reign of terror and the ‘renaissance’ of the monarchy in the military resistance against the French revolutionary and later Napoleonic campaigns. The constitutional formation as a legal act of constituting could therefore defend the monarchy from the threat of the people (Albertine Statute 1848), could be a legal decision of a national constituent assembly (Belgian Constitution 1831), could borrow from the old liberties (Polish May Constitution 1791) or try to remain in between by referring to the Nation as sovereign (French September Constitution 1791, Cádiz Constitution 1812). Common to all contexts is the use of national sovereignty as a legal starting point. The consequent differentiation between constituent and constituted power manages to justify the self-commitment of political power in legal terms. National sovereignty is the synonym for the juridification of sovereignty by means of the constitution. The novelty of the constitutions of the late 18th and 19th century is the normativity, the positivity of the constitutional law as one unified law, to be the measure for the legality of all other law. Therefore ReConFort will continue with the precedence of constitution. (www.reconfort.eu)
    Note: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Language: English
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (419 p.)
    Keywords: Laws of Specific jurisdictions
    Abstract: Precedence of Constitution; Normativity and Constitution; Constitutional History of Europe; Constitutionality of Revolutions; American Constitutional History; Constitutional Normativity; Fundamental Laws; Old Liberties in European History; Unconstitutionality of Statutes; Judicial Review; Normativity and Precedence; Constitutional Precedence of the 3 May System; Constitutional Precedence and Polish Substantial Criminal Law; 1815 Constitution of the Kingdom of Poland; Belgian Constitution of 1831; 1815 Constitution of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands; Constituent Power and Constitutionalism in 19th Century Norway; Spirit of the Albertine Statute; Hans Kelsen and Adolf Julius Merkl
    Note: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Article
    Article
    Show associated volumes/articles
    In:  The Oxford handbook of European legal history (2018), Seite 678-704 | year:2018 | pages:678-704
    ISBN: 9780198785521
    Language: English
    Titel der Quelle: The Oxford handbook of European legal history
    Publ. der Quelle: Oxford, United Kingdom : Oxford University Press, 2018
    Angaben zur Quelle: (2018), Seite 678-704
    Angaben zur Quelle: year:2018
    Angaben zur Quelle: pages:678-704
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...