ISSN:
1660-4601
,
1660-4601
Sprache:
Englisch
Seiten:
1 Online-Ressource (12 Seiten)
Publ. der Quelle:
Basel : MDPI AG
Angaben zur Quelle:
15,10
DDC:
301
Schlagwort(e):
advanced sentiment analysis
;
digital epidemiology
;
geographic information system
;
geo-social media
;
hotspots
;
post-disaster mental health
;
psychogeography
;
spatial epidemiology
;
spatial regimes regression
;
Twitter data
;
Soziologie und Anthropologie
Kurzfassung:
Disasters have substantial consequences for population mental health. We used Twitter to (1) extract negative emotions indicating discomfort in New York City (NYC) before, during, and after Superstorm Sandy in 2012. We further aimed to (2) identify whether pre- or peri-disaster discomfort were associated with peri- or post-disaster discomfort, respectively, and to (3) assess geographic variation in discomfort across NYC census tracts over time. Our sample consisted of 1,018,140 geo-located tweets that were analyzed with an advanced sentiment analysis called ”Extracting the Meaning Of Terse Information in a Visualization of Emotion” (EMOTIVE). We calculated discomfort rates for 2137 NYC census tracts, applied spatial regimes regression to find associations of discomfort, and used Moran’s I for spatial cluster detection across NYC boroughs over time. We found increased discomfort, that is, bundled negative emotions after the storm as compared to during the storm. Furthermore, pre- and peri-disaster discomfort was positively associated with post-disaster discomfort; however, this association was different across boroughs, with significant associations only in Manhattan, the Bronx, and Queens. In addition, rates were most prominently spatially clustered in Staten Island lasting pre- to post-disaster. This is the first study that determined significant associations of negative emotional responses found in social media posts over space and time in the context of a natural disaster, which may guide us in identifying those areas and populations mostly in need for care.
Kurzfassung:
Peer Reviewed
Anmerkung:
This article was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
DOI:
10.3390/ijerph15102275
URN:
urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/20422-5
URL:
Volltext
(kostenfrei)
URL:
Volltext
(kostenfrei)
Permalink
